Faris Alexander S, Cavell Timothy A, Fishburne John W, Britton Peter C
University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53715-1381, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 2009 Sep;65(9):955-70. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20599.
Although empirical investigations strongly support the use of motivational interviewing (MI), there is no theory to clearly explain how or why MI works. The authors propose that MI is efficacious because it mobilizes clients' inherent resources for motivation, learning, creativity, problem solving, and goal-driven activity. Examining MI from a client agency perspective reveals new ways of conceptualizing several critical issues, including MI's fundamental "spirit," the function of resolving ambivalence, the importance of change talk, MI's ability to combine well with other approaches, and the success of brief MI interventions. Implications for the science and practice of MI are discussed from the standpoint that clients are primarily responsible for driving therapeutic gains.
尽管实证研究有力地支持了动机性访谈(MI)的使用,但尚无理论能清晰解释MI如何起作用或为何起作用。作者提出,MI之所以有效,是因为它调动了客户内在的动力、学习、创造力、解决问题及目标驱动活动的资源。从客户机构的角度审视MI,揭示了对几个关键问题进行概念化的新方法,包括MI的基本“精神”、解决矛盾心理的功能、改变谈话的重要性、MI与其他方法良好结合的能力以及简短MI干预的成功。从客户主要负责推动治疗进展的角度讨论了MI的科学与实践意义。