Acer Niyazi, Sahin Bünyamin, Ergür Hayati, Basaloglu Hulki, Ceri Nazli Gülriz
School of Health Sciences, Muğla University, Muğla, Turkey.
J Craniofac Surg. 2009 May;20(3):921-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181a1686d.
Several methodologies have been proposed to assess the orbital volume (OV). However, we have not seen a criterion standard study evaluating the results of the methodologies for the assessment of OV. In the current study, the actual OV of 9 dry skulls was measured using the water filling method as the criterion standard. Consecutive computed tomographic sections at a thickness of 1.5 mm were used to estimate the OV by means of the point counting method. The mean (SD) of the OV measured by the water filling method was 17.84 (1.56) cm3. By using the point counting method, it was 17.05 (1.69) cm3. There was no statistically significant difference between sides (P > 0.001). The results of the OV values obtained by the two methods were compared statistically. The agreements between the two methods were also evaluated using the Bland-Altman plots. There was no statistically significant difference between the OV measurements obtained by the stereological technique and water filling method. The described method could be used for the assessment of OV in vivo.
已经提出了几种方法来评估眼眶容积(OV)。然而,我们尚未见到评估OV评估方法结果的标准对照研究。在本研究中,以注水法测量9个干燥颅骨的实际OV作为标准对照。使用1.5mm厚的连续计算机断层扫描图像,通过点计数法估计OV。注水法测量的OV平均值(标准差)为17.84(1.56)cm³。采用点计数法测量的结果为17.05(1.69)cm³。两侧之间无统计学显著差异(P>0.001)。对两种方法获得的OV值结果进行统计学比较。还使用Bland-Altman图评估两种方法之间的一致性。体视学技术和注水法获得的OV测量值之间无统计学显著差异。所描述的方法可用于体内OV的评估。