Bontzos Georgios, Mazonakis Michael, Papadaki Efrosini, Maris Thomas G, Blazaki Styliani, Drakonaki Eleni E, Detorakis Efstathios T
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Department of Medical Physics, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jan-Jun;11(1):20-27. doi: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_9_20. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
Current volume measurement techniques, for the orbit, are time-consuming and involve complex assessments, which prevents their routine clinical use. In this study, we evaluate the applicability and efficacy of stereology and planimetry in orbital volume measurements using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Prospective imaging study using MRI. Sheep craniums and human subjects were evaluated. Water-filling measurements were performed in animal skulls, as the standard validation technique. Planimetry and stereology techniques were used in each dataset. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability testing were applied.
In stereology customization, 1/6 systematic sampling scheme was determined as optimal with acceptable coefficient of error (3.09%) and low measurement time (1.2 min). In sheep craniums, the mean volume measured by water displacement, planimetry, and stereology was 17.81 ± 0.59 cm, 18.53 ± 0.24 cm, and 19.19 ± 0.17 cm, respectively. Planimetric and stereological methods were highly correlated ( = 0.94; ≈ 0.001). The mean difference of the orbital volume using planimetry and stereology was 0.316 ± 0.168 cm. In human subjects, using stereology, the mean orbital volume was found to be 19.62 ± 0.2 cm with a CE of 3.91 ± 0.15%.
The optimized stereological method was found superior to manual planimetry in terms of user effort and time spent. Stereology sampling of 1/6 was successfully applied in human subjects and showed strong correlation with manual planimetry. However, optimized stereological method tended to overestimate the orbital volume by about 1 cc, a considerable limitation to be taken in clinical practice.
目前用于眼眶的容积测量技术耗时且涉及复杂评估,这阻碍了它们在临床中的常规应用。在本研究中,我们评估了体视学和面积测量法在使用磁共振成像(MRI)进行眼眶容积测量中的适用性和有效性。
采用MRI进行前瞻性成像研究。对绵羊颅骨和人类受试者进行评估。在动物颅骨中进行水填充测量,作为标准验证技术。在每个数据集中使用面积测量法和体视学技术。进行了观察者内和观察者间可靠性测试。
在体视学定制中,确定1/6系统抽样方案为最优,误差系数可接受(3.09%)且测量时间短(1.2分钟)。在绵羊颅骨中,通过排水法、面积测量法和体视学测量的平均容积分别为17.81±0.59立方厘米、18.53±0.24立方厘米和19.19±0.17立方厘米。面积测量法和体视学方法高度相关(r = 0.94;p≈0.001)。使用面积测量法和体视学测量的眼眶容积平均差异为0.316±0.168立方厘米。在人类受试者中,使用体视学方法,发现平均眼眶容积为19.62±0.2立方厘米,CE为3.91±0.15%。
优化后的体视学方法在用户工作量和耗时方面优于手动面积测量法。1/6的体视学抽样成功应用于人类受试者,并与手动面积测量法显示出强相关性。然而,优化后的体视学方法倾向于高估眼眶容积约1立方厘米左右,这是临床实践中需要考虑的一个相当大的局限性。