Fadyl Joanna Kristin, McPherson Kathryn M
School of Rehabilitation and Occupation Studies, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand.
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):195-212. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181a0d458.
Return to work after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important outcome but frequently problematic to achieve. Vocational rehabilitation is commonly recommended as a means of facilitating return to work after TBI. However, there are several different approaches to vocational rehabilitation after TBI and little guidance regarding how to identify the best option for a particular context.
To (1) identify approaches most commonly underpinning vocational interventions in TBI and (2) evaluate the evidence for effectiveness, strengths and weaknesses, and application of each approach for the TBI population.
Principles of systematic review were used for searching and critiquing articles. Findings are expressed as descriptive synthesis owing to heterogeneity of designs and outcome measures.
Three broad categories of vocational rehabilitation for people with TBI were identified on the basis of models that underpin them-program-based vocational rehabilitation, supported employment, and case coordinated. The characteristics, similarities, differences, and applications of each approach are described, as are their strengths and limitations.
There is little clear evidence to suggest what should be considered the "best practice" approach to vocational rehabilitation.
创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后重返工作岗位是一项重要的结果,但往往难以实现。职业康复通常被推荐为促进TBI后重返工作岗位的一种方式。然而,TBI后的职业康复有几种不同的方法,对于如何为特定情况确定最佳选择几乎没有指导。
(1)确定TBI职业干预最常用的方法;(2)评估每种方法对TBI人群的有效性、优缺点及应用证据。
采用系统评价原则检索和评论文章。由于设计和结局测量的异质性,研究结果以描述性综合形式呈现。
基于支撑它们的模型,确定了TBI患者职业康复的三大类——基于项目的职业康复、支持性就业和个案协调。描述了每种方法的特点、异同点及应用,以及它们的优点和局限性。
几乎没有明确的证据表明职业康复的“最佳实践”方法应该是什么。