Kinsman Leigh D, Buykx Penny, Humphreys John S, Snow Pamela C, Willis Jon
School of Rural Health, Monash University, VIC, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 May 25;9:83. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-83.
People living in rural Australia are more likely to die in hospital following an acute myocardial infarction than those living in major cities. While several factors, including time taken to access hospital care, contribute to this risk, it is also partially attributable to the lower uptake of evidence-based guidelines for the administration of thrombolytic drugs in rural emergency departments where up to one-third of eligible patients do not receive this life-saving intervention. Clinical pathways have the potential to link evidence to practice by integrating guidelines into local systems, but their impact has been hampered by variable implementation strategies and sub-optimal research designs. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of a five-step clinical pathways implementation process on the timely and efficient administration of thrombolytic drugs for acute myocardial infarctions managed in rural Australian emergency departments.
METHODS/DESIGN: The design is a two-arm, cluster-randomised trial with rural hospital emergency departments that treat and do not routinely transfer acute myocardial infarction patients. Six rural hospitals in the state of Victoria will participate, with three in the intervention group and three in the control group. Intervention hospitals will participate in a five-step clinical pathway implementation process: engagement of clinicians, pathway development according to local resources and systems, reminders, education, and audit and feedback. Hospitals in the control group will each receive a hard copy of Australian national guidelines for chest pain and acute myocardial infarction management. Each group will include 90 cases to give a power of 80% at 5% significance level for the two primary outcome measures: proportion of those eligible for thrombolysis receiving the drug and time to delivery of thrombolytic drug.
Improved compliance with thrombolytic guidelines via clinical pathways will increase acute myocardial infarction survival rates in rural hospitals and thereby help to reduce rural-urban mortality inequalities. Such knowledge translation has the potential to be adapted for a range of clinical problems in a wide array of settings.
Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry code ACTRN12608000209392.
与生活在大城市的人相比,澳大利亚农村地区的居民在急性心肌梗死后更有可能在医院死亡。虽然包括获得医院护理所需时间在内的几个因素导致了这种风险,但部分原因也在于农村急诊科对基于证据的溶栓药物管理指南的采用率较低,在这些科室,高达三分之一的符合条件的患者未接受这种挽救生命的干预措施。临床路径有可能通过将指南纳入地方系统,将证据与实践联系起来,但其影响因实施策略的差异和研究设计的不够完善而受到阻碍。本研究的目的是确定五步临床路径实施过程对澳大利亚农村急诊科管理的急性心肌梗死溶栓药物的及时和有效使用的影响。
方法/设计:该设计为双臂整群随机试验,研究对象为治疗急性心肌梗死患者且不常规转诊的农村医院急诊科。维多利亚州的六家农村医院将参与研究,其中三家为干预组,三家为对照组。干预医院将参与五步临床路径实施过程:临床医生参与、根据当地资源和系统制定路径、提醒、教育以及审核与反馈。对照组医院将各自收到一份澳大利亚胸痛和急性心肌梗死管理国家指南的纸质版。每组将包括90个病例,以便在5%的显著性水平下,针对两个主要结局指标(符合溶栓条件的患者接受药物治疗的比例和溶栓药物给药时间)达到80%的检验效能。
通过临床路径提高对溶栓指南的依从性,将提高农村医院急性心肌梗死的生存率,从而有助于减少城乡死亡率不平等现象。这种知识转化有可能适用于广泛环境中的一系列临床问题。
澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心代码ACTRN12608000209392。