Carliss Richard D S, Keefer James F, Perschke Scott, Welch Sandra, Rich Thomas C, Weissman Arthur D
University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2009 May;92(3):495-502. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2009.01.019. Epub 2009 Jan 31.
Structure-activity relationships built around receptor binding or cell-based assays are designed to reveal physiochemical differences between ligands. We hypothesized that agonist receptor reserve may provide a unique approach to distinguish structurally-related agonists exhibiting similar functional characteristics. An intracellular calcium activation assay in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells expressing cloned human mu-opioid receptors was developed. We examined two isomers exhibiting indistinguishable receptor binding and in vitro potency profiles. Oxymorphone, a clinically-available congener of codeine has at least two active diastereomeric metabolites (6alpha- and 6beta-oxymorphols) found to be similar for mu-opioid receptor binding affinity (K(d) = 15 versus 14 nM) and calcium activation (EC(50) = 22 versus 14 nM). Calcium activation was then inhibited in CHO cells in a concentration-dependent manner using the irreversible mu-opioid receptor antagonist, beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA). Under these conditions, approximately 10-fold greater receptor reserve was found for 6alpha-oxymorphol compared to 6beta-oxymorphol. This difference between the oxymorphols corresponded to a rank order of intrinsic efficacy (Emax): DAMGO > oxymorphone = 6alpha-oxymorphol = oxycodone > 6beta-oxymorphol. In addition, 6alpha-oxymorphol exhibited greater relative potency than the 6beta-oxymorphol in mouse tail-flick, hot-plate and phenylquinone writhing antinociceptive assays, regardless of route of administration. Thus the beta-FNA/calcium model provides a novel, cell-based approach to distinguish structurally related mu-opioid agonists, and in the specific case of the oxymorphols, receptor reserve differences provided a means to bridge functional in vitro and in vivo models.
围绕受体结合或基于细胞的分析建立的构效关系旨在揭示配体之间的物理化学差异。我们假设激动剂受体储备可能提供一种独特的方法来区分具有相似功能特征的结构相关激动剂。我们开发了一种在中国仓鼠卵巢(CHO)细胞中表达克隆的人μ-阿片受体的细胞内钙激活分析方法。我们研究了两种在受体结合和体外效价方面表现出无法区分特征的异构体。羟吗啡酮是可待因的临床可用同系物,它有至少两种具有活性的非对映体代谢物(6α-和6β-羟吗啡),发现它们对μ-阿片受体的结合亲和力相似(K(d)分别为15 nM和14 nM),对钙激活的作用也相似(EC(50)分别为22 nM和14 nM)。然后使用不可逆的μ-阿片受体拮抗剂β-芬太尼(β-FNA)以浓度依赖性方式抑制CHO细胞中的钙激活。在这些条件下,发现6α-羟吗啡的受体储备比6β-羟吗啡大约高10倍。这两种羟吗啡之间的差异对应于内在效能(Emax)的顺序:DAMGO > 羟吗啡酮 = 6α-羟吗啡 = 羟考酮 > 6β-羟吗啡。此外,在小鼠甩尾、热板和苯醌扭体镇痛试验中,无论给药途径如何,6α-羟吗啡的相对效价均高于6β-羟吗啡。因此,β-FNA/钙模型提供了一种基于细胞的新方法来区分结构相关的μ-阿片激动剂,在羟吗啡的具体案例中,受体储备差异提供了一种连接体外和体内功能模型的手段。