• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科出院后儿童程序性镇静和镇痛的效果:氯胺酮与芬太尼/咪达唑仑的比较

Procedural sedation and analgesia outcomes in children after discharge from the emergency department: ketamine versus fentanyl/midazolam.

作者信息

McQueen Alisa, Wright Robert O, Kido Maya M, Kaye Erica, Krauss Baruch

机构信息

Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Aug;54(2):191-97.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.04.015. Epub 2009 May 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.04.015
PMID:19464072
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Although the safety and efficacy of procedural sedation and analgesia in the pediatric emergency department (ED) has been established, the prevalence of adverse events after discharge has not been well studied. We compare the postdischarge incidence of adverse behavioral events and vomiting and hypothesize that ketamine would be associated with increased adverse behaviors.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study of postdischarge behavioral changes and vomiting after sedation with ketamine, ketamine/midazolam, or fentanyl/midazolam. Families were administered a Post Hospital Behavior Questionnaire (PHBQ), with higher scores indicating more adverse behaviors (anxiety, sleep disturbances). We used linear and logistic regression to model PHBQ scores and logistic regression to model vomiting risk adjusting for age, sex, procedure, length of procedure, and parental presence as potential confounders.

RESULTS

Seven hundred eighty-six children were enrolled and 554 children (61% boys; mean age 7.5+/-4.5 years) were contacted. The prevalence of postdischarge vomiting was 18%, but the prevalence of adverse behavioral changes was low. When adjusted for potential confounders, the odds of a higher PHBQ score increased among patients receiving fentanyl/midazolam (fentanyl/midazolam odds ratio [OR] 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08 to 6.03, P=.03; ketamine OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.84 to 3.57; ketamine/midazolam OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.07).

CONCLUSION

Procedural sedation and analgesia in the ED is well tolerated. Though postdischarge vomiting occurs with some frequency, there is a low prevalence of adverse behavioral events after discharge. The use of fentanyl/midazolam was associated with higher adverse behavioral scores.

摘要

研究目的

尽管儿科急诊科程序性镇静镇痛的安全性和有效性已得到证实,但出院后不良事件的发生率尚未得到充分研究。我们比较出院后不良行为事件和呕吐的发生率,并假设氯胺酮会增加不良行为的发生。

方法

我们对氯胺酮、氯胺酮/咪达唑仑或芬太尼/咪达唑仑镇静后出院后的行为变化和呕吐进行了前瞻性观察研究。向家属发放了一份出院后行为问卷(PHBQ),得分越高表明不良行为(焦虑、睡眠障碍)越多。我们使用线性回归和逻辑回归对PHBQ得分进行建模,并使用逻辑回归对呕吐风险进行建模,将年龄、性别、操作、操作时长和家长在场作为潜在混杂因素进行调整。

结果

共纳入786名儿童,联系到554名儿童(61%为男孩;平均年龄7.5±4.5岁)。出院后呕吐的发生率为18%,但不良行为变化的发生率较低。在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,接受芬太尼/咪达唑仑的患者PHBQ得分较高的几率增加(芬太尼/咪达唑仑优势比[OR]2.6,95%置信区间[CI]1.08至6.03,P = 0.03;氯胺酮OR 1.7,95%CI 0.84至3.57;氯胺酮/咪达唑仑OR 0.5,95%CI 0.26至1.07)。

结论

儿科急诊科的程序性镇静镇痛耐受性良好。尽管出院后呕吐时有发生,但出院后不良行为事件的发生率较低。芬太尼/咪达唑仑的使用与较高的不良行为得分相关。

相似文献

1
Procedural sedation and analgesia outcomes in children after discharge from the emergency department: ketamine versus fentanyl/midazolam.急诊科出院后儿童程序性镇静和镇痛的效果:氯胺酮与芬太尼/咪达唑仑的比较
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Aug;54(2):191-97.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.04.015. Epub 2009 May 22.
2
Adverse events associated with procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department: a comparison of common parenteral drugs.儿科急诊科与程序性镇静和镇痛相关的不良事件:常用注射药物的比较。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jun;12(6):508-13. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.12.009.
3
Does midazolam alter the clinical effects of intravenous ketamine sedation in children? A double-blind, randomized, controlled, emergency department trial.咪达唑仑会改变儿童静脉注射氯胺酮镇静的临床效果吗?一项双盲、随机、对照的急诊科试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Dec;36(6):579-88. doi: 10.1067/mem.2000.111131.
4
Ketamine/midazolam versus etomidate/fentanyl: procedural sedation for pediatric orthopedic reductions.氯胺酮/咪达唑仑与依托咪酯/芬太尼:用于小儿骨科复位的程序性镇静
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Jun;26(6):408-12. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181e057cd.
5
To study the effectiveness and safety of ketamine and midazolam procedural sedation in the incision and drainage of abscesses in the adult emergency department.研究氯胺酮和咪达唑仑用于成人急诊科脓肿切开引流术中程序镇静的有效性和安全性。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2008 Jun;15(3):169-72. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3282efdd7a.
6
Safe and efficacious use of procedural sedation and analgesia by nonanesthesiologists in a pediatric emergency department.非麻醉医生在儿科急诊科安全有效地使用程序性镇静和镇痛。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Nov;157(11):1090-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1090.
7
Subdissociative-dose ketamine versus fentanyl for analgesia during propofol procedural sedation: a randomized clinical trial.亚解离剂量氯胺酮与芬太尼用于丙泊酚程序性镇静期间镇痛的随机临床试验
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;15(10):877-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00219.x. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
8
Intravenous ketamine plus midazolam vs. intravenous ketamine for sedation in lumbar puncture: a randomized controlled trial.静脉注射氯胺酮加咪达唑仑与静脉注射氯胺酮用于腰椎穿刺镇静的随机对照试验。
Indian Pediatr. 2008 Nov;45(11):899-904.
9
Adverse events and behavioral reactions related to ketamine based anesthesia for anorectal manometry in children.儿童用于肛门直肠测压的氯胺酮麻醉相关不良事件及行为反应。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Mar;18(3):260-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02410.x.
10
Ketamine/propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department: a randomized, prospective, double-blind trial.氯胺酮/异丙酚与咪达唑仑/芬太尼在急诊科镇静和镇痛中的应用:一项随机、前瞻性、双盲试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(8):800-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01133.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Paediatric laceration repair in the emergency department: post-discharge pain and maladaptive behavioural changes.儿科急诊外伤修复:出院后疼痛和适应不良的行为改变。
Emerg Med J. 2024 Jul 22;41(8):469-474. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213858.
2
Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of Ketamine Versus Benzodiazepine/Opioid Combination for Procedural Sedation in Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis.比较氯胺酮与苯二氮卓类/阿片类药物联合用于急诊医学程序镇静的安全性和有效性:一项综合综述和荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2023 Mar 27;15(3):e36742. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36742. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Post-Discharge Effects and Parents' Opinions of Intranasal Fentanyl with Oral Midazolam Sedation in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.
出院后效应及家长对小儿牙科患者鼻内芬太尼联合口服咪达唑仑镇静的看法:一项横断面研究
Children (Basel). 2022 Jan 22;9(2):142. doi: 10.3390/children9020142.
4
Ketamine versus Ketamine / magnesium Sulfate for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial.急诊科中氯胺酮与氯胺酮/硫酸镁用于程序性镇静和镇痛的随机临床试验
Adv Biomed Res. 2018 Jan 30;7:19. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_143_16. eCollection 2018.
5
Predictors of emesis in children undergoing procedural sedation with intramuscular ketamine in a paediatric emergency department.在儿科急诊科接受肌肉注射氯胺酮进行程序性镇静的儿童中呕吐的预测因素。
Singapore Med J. 2017 Nov;58(11):660-665. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016187. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
6
Efficacy of oral ketamine compared to midazolam for sedation of children undergoing laceration repair: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.口服氯胺酮与咪达唑仑用于儿童裂伤修复镇静的疗效比较:一项双盲、随机、对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun;95(26):e3984. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003984.
7
Incidence of adverse events in paediatric procedural sedation in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急诊科儿童程序性镇静中不良事件的发生率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 15;6(6):e011384. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011384.
8
Comparison of the effects of ketamine and fentanyl-midazolam-medetomidine for sedation of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).氯胺酮与芬太尼-咪达唑仑-右美托咪定对恒河猴(猕猴)镇静效果的比较。
BMC Vet Res. 2016 Jun 8;12:93. doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0721-9.
9
Post-sedation events in children sedated for dental care.接受牙科治疗镇静的儿童的镇静后事件。
Anesth Prog. 2013 Summer;60(2):54-9. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-60.2.54.