Suppr超能文献

比较氯胺酮与苯二氮卓类/阿片类药物联合用于急诊医学程序镇静的安全性和有效性:一项综合综述和荟萃分析。

Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of Ketamine Versus Benzodiazepine/Opioid Combination for Procedural Sedation in Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Zaki Hany A, Ibrahim Tarek, Osman Ahmed, Elnabawy Wael Abdelrehem, Gebril Amr, Hamdi Ahmed H, Mohamed Eslam Hussein

机构信息

Emergency Medicine Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.

Emergency Department, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EGY.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Mar 27;15(3):e36742. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36742. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Procedural sedation is essential in the ED to conduct painful procedures effectively. Ketamine and benzodiazepines/opioids are commonly used, with ketamine providing adequate analgesia and preserving airway muscle tone. However, ketamine is associated with adverse effects while benzodiazepines/opioids can lead to respiratory depression. This study compares the safety and efficacy of ketamine and midazolam/fentanyl. Two search methods were used to identify studies related to our topic, including a database search and a manual search involving screening reference lists of articles retrieved by the database search. A methodological quality appraisal was conducted on the articles suitable for inclusion using Cochrane's risk of bias tool in the Review Manager software (Review Manager (RevMan) (Computer program). Version 5.4, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020). Moreover, pooled analysis was performed using the Review manager software. The study analyzed 1366 articles, of which seven were included for analysis. Pooled data showed that ketamine and midazolam/fentanyl had similar effects on pain scores during procedures and sedation depth measured by the University of Michigan sedation scale. However, the Modified Ramsay Sedation Score showed significantly more profound sedation in the ketamine group. The only significant adverse events were vomiting and nausea, which had a higher incidence in the ketamine group. Our data suggest that ketamine is as effective as the midazolam/fentanyl combination for procedural sedation but is associated with higher incidences of adverse events. Therefore, midazolam/fentanyl can be recommended for procedural sedation in the ED. However, it should be provided in the presence of a physician comfortable with airway management due to high incidences of oxygen desaturation.

摘要

在急诊科,实施程序性镇静对于有效开展疼痛性操作至关重要。氯胺酮和苯二氮䓬类药物/阿片类药物是常用药物,氯胺酮可提供充分的镇痛效果并维持气道肌肉张力。然而,氯胺酮会产生不良反应,而苯二氮䓬类药物/阿片类药物可能导致呼吸抑制。本研究比较了氯胺酮与咪达唑仑/芬太尼的安全性和有效性。采用了两种检索方法来识别与我们主题相关的研究,包括数据库检索和人工检索,人工检索涉及筛选通过数据库检索获得的文章的参考文献列表。使用Review Manager软件(Review Manager (RevMan)(计算机程序)。第5.4版,Cochrane协作网,2020年)中的Cochrane偏倚风险工具,对适合纳入的文章进行了方法学质量评估。此外,使用Review manager软件进行了汇总分析。该研究分析了1366篇文章,其中7篇被纳入分析。汇总数据显示,氯胺酮和咪达唑仑/芬太尼在操作过程中的疼痛评分以及由密歇根大学镇静量表测量的镇静深度方面具有相似的效果。然而,改良Ramsay镇静评分显示氯胺酮组的镇静效果明显更深。唯一显著的不良事件是呕吐和恶心,其在氯胺酮组中的发生率更高。我们的数据表明,氯胺酮在程序性镇静方面与咪达唑仑/芬太尼组合一样有效,但不良事件的发生率更高。因此,对于急诊科的程序性镇静,可推荐使用咪达唑仑/芬太尼。然而,由于氧饱和度降低的发生率较高,应在有气道管理经验的医生在场的情况下使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19fd/10132230/a7dec1d97895/cureus-0015-00000036742-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验