Suppr超能文献

儿科急诊科与程序性镇静和镇痛相关的不良事件:常用注射药物的比较。

Adverse events associated with procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department: a comparison of common parenteral drugs.

作者信息

Roback Mark G, Wathen Joe E, Bajaj Lalit, Bothner Joan P

机构信息

The Children's Hospital, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jun;12(6):508-13. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.12.009.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the frequency and severity of adverse events associated with parenteral drugs commonly used for procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) in a pediatric emergency department.

METHODS

A database of consecutive patients receiving parenteral PSA was prospectively generated with the intent of monitoring safety in the emergency department. Data were logged onto a dedicated sedation sheet. A retrospective analysis was performed; comparisons were made based on sedation drugs used.

RESULTS

A total of 2,609 patients from June 1, 1996, to September 16, 2003, received PSA by emergency physicians. Patients who received PSA nonparenterally (n = 109) were excluded. A total of 2,500 patients (2,279, intravenous; 221, intramuscular) remained for analysis. Age range was 19 days to 32 years (median, 6.7 years). A total of 1,511 (60.4%) were male. Four major drug combinations were identified: ketamine alone (n = 1,492; 59.7%), ketamine/midazolam (n = 299; 12.0%), midazolam/fentanyl (n = 336; 13.4%), and midazolam alone (n = 260; 10.4%). A total of 113 patients (4.5%) received various other combinations of drugs. A total of 458 adverse events were observed in 426 patients (17%). Respiratory adverse events occurred as follows: ketamine alone, 91 patients (6.1%); ketamine/midazolam, 30 patients (10%); midazolam/fentanyl, 65 patients (19.3%); midazolam alone, 15 patients (5.8%). Vomiting occurred as follows: ketamine alone, 151 patients (10.1%); ketamine/midazolam, 16 patients (5.4%); midazolam/fentanyl, six patients (1.8%); midazolam alone, two patients (0.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Drug types used in pediatric PSA are associated with different adverse event profiles. Patients receiving ketamine with or without midazolam experienced fewer respiratory adverse events but more vomiting than the commonly used combination of midazolam and fentanyl. Adverse events may occur in any patient receiving parenteral PSA.

摘要

目的

比较儿科急诊科常用于程序性镇静和镇痛(PSA)的肠外药物相关不良事件的发生频率和严重程度。

方法

前瞻性建立接受肠外PSA的连续患者数据库,旨在监测急诊科的安全性。数据记录在专用的镇静记录表上。进行回顾性分析;根据使用的镇静药物进行比较。

结果

1996年6月1日至2003年9月16日,共有2609例患者由急诊医生进行了PSA。非肠外接受PSA的患者(n = 109)被排除。共有2500例患者(2279例静脉注射;221例肌肉注射)留作分析。年龄范围为19天至32岁(中位数为6.7岁)。共有1511例(60.4%)为男性。确定了四种主要药物组合:单独使用氯胺酮(n = 1492;59.7%)、氯胺酮/咪达唑仑(n = 299;12.0%)、咪达唑仑/芬太尼(n = 336;13.4%)和单独使用咪达唑仑(n = 260;10.4%)。共有113例患者(4.5%)接受了各种其他药物组合。在426例患者(17%)中观察到共458例不良事件。呼吸不良事件的发生情况如下:单独使用氯胺酮,91例患者(6.1%);氯胺酮/咪达唑仑,30例患者(10%);咪达唑仑/芬太尼,65例患者(19.3%);单独使用咪达唑仑,15例患者(5.8%)。呕吐的发生情况如下:单独使用氯胺酮,151例患者(10.1%);氯胺酮/咪达唑仑,16例患者(5.4%);咪达唑仑/芬太尼,6例患者(1.8%);单独使用咪达唑仑,2例患者(0.8%)。

结论

儿科PSA中使用的药物类型与不同的不良事件谱相关。接受氯胺酮联合或不联合咪达唑仑治疗的患者呼吸不良事件较少,但呕吐比常用的咪达唑仑和芬太尼组合更多。任何接受肠外PSA的患者都可能发生不良事件。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验