Eberhardt Frank, Heringlake Matthias, Massalme Maximilian S, Dyllus Anika, Misfeld Martin, Sievers Hans-H, Wiegand Uwe K H, Hanke Thorsten
Medical Clinic II, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Jun;137(6):1461-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.11.025. Epub 2009 Mar 29.
Biventricular pacing acutely improves left ventricular function in patients with heart failure and left ventricular dyssynchrony. Pressure-volume loop analysis has shown acute perioperative hemodynamic benefits of biventricular pacing immediately after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, but whether these effects can be maintained for the early postoperative period is unclear. We hypothesized that biventricular pacing is superior to atrioventricular universal pacing at right ventricular outflowtract and atrial inhibited pacing in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Ninety-four patients (mean age, 67 +/- 9 years; mean ejection fraction, 35% +/- 4%) were prospectively randomized to undergo biventricular, atrioventricular universal, or atrial inhibited pacing at 90 beats/min for 96 postoperative hours. Clinical end points and postoperative hemodynamics, aminoterminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, inotropic support, atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmias, and renal function were evaluated.
Diastolic pulmonary arterial pressure, mean arterial pressure, mixed venous saturation, cardiac index, and cardiac power index did not differ significantly among groups for all time points. Neither raw aminoterminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide nor differential from preoperative values differed significantly among groups at any time point. Median intensive care unit stay (19.5 hours) did not differ significantly by pacing mode. Incidences of postoperative atrial fibrillation were 40% for atrial inhibited, 29% for atrioventricular universal, and 37% for biventricular (differences not significant). Renal function was unaffected by pacing mode.
Despite short-term hemodynamic benefits for patients with reduced left ventricular function, biventricular pacing did not lead to improved postoperative hemodynamics or clinical outcome.
双心室起搏可急性改善心力衰竭和左心室不同步患者的左心室功能。压力 - 容积环分析显示,在接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者中,体外循环脱机后立即进行双心室起搏具有急性围手术期血流动力学益处,但这些效果能否在术后早期维持尚不清楚。我们假设在接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者中,双心室起搏优于右心室流出道房室通用起搏和心房抑制起搏。
94例患者(平均年龄67±9岁;平均射血分数35%±4%)被前瞻性随机分为三组,分别接受90次/分钟的双心室起搏、房室通用起搏或心房抑制起搏,持续96小时。评估临床终点、术后血流动力学、氨基末端脑钠肽前体、正性肌力支持、心房颤动、室性心律失常和肾功能。
在所有时间点,各组之间的舒张期肺动脉压、平均动脉压、混合静脉血氧饱和度、心脏指数和心脏功率指数均无显著差异。在任何时间点,各组之间的氨基末端脑钠肽前体原始值或与术前值的差异均无显著差异。重症监护病房停留时间中位数(19.5小时)在起搏模式之间无显著差异。术后心房颤动的发生率在心房抑制起搏组为40%,房室通用起搏组为29%,双心室起搏组为37%(差异不显著)。肾功能不受起搏模式影响。
尽管双心室起搏对左心室功能降低的患者有短期血流动力学益处,但并未改善术后血流动力学或临床结局。