Suppr超能文献

双心室起搏对左心室功能减退患者体外循环撤机后心脏功能的影响:压力-容积环分析

The effect of biventricular pacing on cardiac function after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with reduced left ventricular function: a pressure-volume loop analysis.

作者信息

Hanke Thorsten, Misfeld Martin, Heringlake Matthias, Schreuder Jan J, Wiegand Uwe K H, Eberhardt Frank

机构信息

Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Jul;138(1):148-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Apr 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patients with severely reduced left ventricular function undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting have increased complication rates. We hypothesized that temporary postoperative atrial synchronous biventricular pacing would improve left ventricular function after cardiopulmonary bypass.

METHODS

A left ventricular pressure-volume catheter was placed in 21 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (ejection fraction 29% +/- 5%). Pressure-volume loops were obtained after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass with atrial synchronous biventricular, left ventricular, and right ventricular outflow tract pacing and atrial-only stimulation at 90 beats/min.

RESULTS

Steady-state systolic and preload-independent parameters were superior for atrial synchronous biventricular and left ventricular pacing and atrial-only pacing relative to atrial synchronous right ventricular outflow tract pacing (P < .05). Diastolic parameters, excepting maximum negative rate of left ventricular pressure change, were unaffected. No significant differences were observed between atrial synchronous biventricular and left ventricular pacing and atrial-only pacing. Systolic dyssynchrony was significantly lower for atrial synchronous biventricular pacing (21% +/- 5%), atrial synchronous left ventricular pacing (20% +/- 6%), and atrial-only pacing (20% +/- 6%) versus atrial synchronous right ventricular outflow tract pacing (25% +/- 7%, P < .05). Atrioventricular interval during atrial-only stimulation was positively correlated with difference in stroke work between atrial synchronous biventricular pacing and atrial-only pacing (r(2) = 0.78, P > .001).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative atrial synchronous biventricular and left ventricular pacing and atrial-only stimulation significantly improve systolic function relative to atrial synchronous right ventricular outflow tract pacing. If atrioventricular conduction is prolonged, atrial synchronous biventricular pacing is preferable to atrial-only pacing.

摘要

目的

接受冠状动脉搭桥术的左心室功能严重减退患者并发症发生率较高。我们推测术后临时心房同步双心室起搏可改善体外循环后的左心室功能。

方法

将左心室压力-容积导管置入21例接受冠状动脉搭桥术的患者体内(射血分数为29%±5%)。在体外循环脱机后,分别以90次/分钟的频率进行心房同步双心室起搏、左心室起搏、右心室流出道起搏以及单纯心房刺激,获取压力-容积环。

结果

与心房同步右心室流出道起搏相比,心房同步双心室起搏、左心室起搏及单纯心房起搏的稳态收缩期和与前负荷无关的参数更优(P<.05)。除左心室压力变化最大负速率外,舒张期参数未受影响。心房同步双心室起搏与左心室起搏及单纯心房起搏之间未观察到显著差异。与心房同步右心室流出道起搏(25%±7%,P<.05)相比,心房同步双心室起搏(21%±5%)、心房同步左心室起搏(20%±6%)及单纯心房起搏(20%±6%)的收缩期不同步性显著降低。单纯心房刺激时的房室间期与心房同步双心室起搏和单纯心房起搏之间的每搏功差异呈正相关(r² = 0.78,P>.001)。

结论

相对于心房同步右心室流出道起搏,术后心房同步双心室起搏、左心室起搏及单纯心房刺激可显著改善收缩功能。如果房室传导延长,心房同步双心室起搏优于单纯心房起搏。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验