Busani Luca, Toson Marica, Stegeman Arjan, Pozza Manuela Dalla, Comin Arianna, Mulatti Paolo, Cecchinato Mattia, Marangon Stefano
Centro Regionale di Epidemiologia Veterinaria, Istituto Zooprofilattico delle Venezie, Viale dell'Università 10, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy.
Vaccine. 2009 Jun 2;27(27):3655-61. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.03.033. Epub 2009 Apr 5.
When outbreaks of avian influenza (AI) occur in poultry populations, the main goal to achieve is the control and eradication of the infection. However, quantitative information on risk factors for AI spread and efficacy of AI control measures such as vaccination in the field is limited. From 2000 to 2005, H5 and H7 low pathogenicity (LP) AI viruses caused four epidemics in poultry in northeastern Italy. Italian veterinary authorities implemented emergency vaccination in the 2000-2001 and 2002-2003 LPAI epidemics and prophylactic vaccination from July 2004. The aim of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of AI vaccination in the field, taking into account the different strategies (emergency and prophylactic) implemented. Moreover, risk factors for LPAI spread in domestic poultry were studied. By survival analysis, we observed a two-fold increase in survival probability for vaccinated poultry farms compared to unvaccinated ones. In meat turkeys, vaccination protocols changed in the different epidemics, and a relationship between protection and the number of vaccinations was observed; two or three vaccine administrations protected flocks from LPAI, whilst four administrations did not significantly reduce the risk of infection. In meat turkeys the risk of AI infection increased also with the increase in both farm size and proximity to an infected farm. In general, we observed a lower number of outbreaks and a faster eradication of the infection when LPAI viruses introduced in a preventively vaccinated poultry population. This study provides insights on LPAI vaccination efficacy and on risk factors involved in LPAI infection at farm level. To our knowledge, this is the first study which quantitatively evaluates AI vaccination efficacy and compares different vaccination strategies and protocols using field data.
当家禽群体中发生禽流感(AI)疫情时,主要目标是控制和根除感染。然而,关于禽流感传播的风险因素以及诸如现场接种疫苗等禽流感控制措施的效果的定量信息有限。2000年至2005年期间,H5和H7低致病性(LP)禽流感病毒在意大利东北部的家禽中引发了四次疫情。意大利兽医当局在2000 - 2001年和2002 - 2003年低致病性禽流感疫情中实施了紧急接种疫苗,并从2004年7月开始进行预防性接种。本研究的目的是在考虑所实施的不同策略(紧急和预防性)的情况下,定量评估现场禽流感疫苗接种的效果。此外,还研究了低致病性禽流感在家禽中传播的风险因素。通过生存分析,我们观察到与未接种疫苗的家禽养殖场相比,接种疫苗的家禽养殖场的生存概率提高了两倍。在肉用火鸡中,不同疫情期间的疫苗接种方案有所变化,并且观察到了保护作用与接种次数之间的关系;两次或三次疫苗接种可保护鸡群免受低致病性禽流感的侵害,而四次接种并未显著降低感染风险。在肉用火鸡中,禽流感感染风险也随着养殖场规模的增大以及与受感染养殖场距离的缩短而增加。总体而言,当低致病性禽流感病毒引入预防性接种疫苗的家禽群体时,我们观察到疫情爆发次数减少,感染根除速度加快。本研究提供了关于低致病性禽流感疫苗接种效果以及养殖场层面低致病性禽流感感染所涉及的风险因素的见解。据我们所知,这是第一项使用现场数据定量评估禽流感疫苗接种效果并比较不同接种策略和方案的研究。