Peyre Marisa, Samaha Hamid, Makonnen Yilma Jobre, Saad Ahmed, Abd-Elnabi Amira, Galal Saber, Ettel Toni, Dauphin Gwenaelle, Lubroth Juan, Roger François, Domenech Joseph
J Mol Genet Med. 2009 Dec 9;3(2):198-204. doi: 10.4172/1747-0862.1000035.
Vaccination of domestic poultry against avian influenza (AI) has been used on a large-scale in South East Asia since 2003 and in Egypt since 2006 to fight H5N1 highly-pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) epidemics. The decision to use mass vaccination against HPAI in Egypt was taken as an emergency measure based on positive impact of such control measures in Vietnam and the People's Republic of China. However, three years on, the impact on disease control of AI vaccination in Egypt has been very limited. Despite the continuous vaccination of poultry against HPAI, poultry outbreaks and human cases are reported regularly. A recent assessment study highlighted substantial weaknesses in the current immunisation programme and its lack of positive impact on the spread of infection or the maintenance of public health safety. The shortcomings of the vaccination strategy may be attributed in part to a lack of sufficient support in terms of funding and communication, the absence of an efficient monitoring system, and inadequate training of field technicians. The difficulties of blanket vaccinations in semi-commercial farms and household poultry sectors are well known, however, improvements in the industrial sector should be possible though better government controls and greater collaboration with the private sector. AI vaccination should be regarded as just one control tool within a broader disease control program integrating surveillance, outbreak investigation, disease management systems, and the rigorous implementation of bio-security measures. If incorrectly implemented, AI vaccination has a limited impact as a disease control measure. Moreover, without strict bio-security precautions undertaken during its application, farm visits to vaccinate poultry could facilitate the spread of the virus and therefore become a risk factor with important implications on the maintenance of the virus and potential risk for human exposure.
自2003年以来,东南亚地区一直在大规模使用家禽禽流感疫苗,埃及自2006年起也开始使用该疫苗,以对抗H5N1高致病性禽流感(HPAI)疫情。埃及决定对HPAI进行大规模疫苗接种,是基于这种控制措施在越南和中国所产生的积极影响而采取的一项紧急措施。然而,三年过去了,埃及禽流感疫苗接种对疾病控制的影响非常有限。尽管持续对家禽进行HPAI疫苗接种,但家禽疫情和人类感染病例仍时有报道。最近的一项评估研究突出了当前免疫计划中的重大缺陷,以及该计划对感染传播或公共卫生安全维护缺乏积极影响。疫苗接种策略的缺点部分可归因于在资金和宣传方面缺乏足够支持、缺乏有效的监测系统以及现场技术人员培训不足。在半商业化养殖场和家庭家禽养殖部门进行全面疫苗接种存在诸多困难,这是众所周知的,不过,通过加强政府监管以及与私营部门加强合作,工业部门应该有可能得到改善。禽流感疫苗接种应被视为更广泛疾病控制计划中的一种控制工具,该计划整合了监测、疫情调查、疾病管理系统以及严格实施生物安全措施。如果实施不当,禽流感疫苗接种作为一种疾病控制措施的影响有限。此外,如果在疫苗接种过程中不采取严格的生物安全预防措施,前往养殖场给家禽接种疫苗可能会促进病毒传播,因此成为一个风险因素,对病毒的持续存在以及人类接触病毒的潜在风险具有重要影响。