Meyer-Baron Monika, Knapp Guido, Schäper Michael, van Thriel Christoph
IfADo - Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.
Neurotoxicology. 2009 Jul;30(4):487-96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 May 22.
The review aimed at quantifying the evidence of performance effects resulting from occupational exposure to manganese. Epidemiological studies published between 1987 and 2008 were analyzed. The approach was based on the meta-analytical method of effect size estimates and sought to contribute to the following issues: (1) identification of the affected functions; (2) identification of sensitive neuropsychological tests; (3) analyses of exposure-effect relationships. Thirteen studies examining 958 exposed and 815 unexposed workers were included in the meta-analysis. Mean concentrations of inhalable manganese ranged from 0.05 to 1.59 mg/m(3), mean concentrations of manganese in whole blood ranged from 8.1 to 48.4 microg/L. Nineteen neuropsychological performance variables were analyzed as they were included in at least three of the identified studies. Apart from two outcomes, the overall effects displayed a negative impact of manganese on performance. Significant overall effects were obtained for six test variables; their size ranged from d=-0.23 to -0.36. Four of the variables measured motor speed and two of them speed of information processing. The analysis of exposure-effect relationships showed that larger effect sizes were more consistently associated with higher concentrations of inhalable manganese than with manganese in blood. The evidence of cognitive and motor performance effects is in accordance with the knowledge about accumulation of manganese in the basal ganglia and the effect of manganese on the neurotransmitter dopamine. Inconsistencies in the relationship between effect sizes and the biomarker manganese in blood were discussed in the context of results indicating that the biomarker might not be sufficiently meaningful for the neurobehavioral alterations. Simple motor performance tests with a distinct speed component seem to be highly recommendable for further studies, because they seem to be appropriate for measuring manganese-related changes, seem to provide homogenous results and their outcomes show consistent relations to exposure. The rigorous quantitative approach was especially appropriate for revealing exposure-effect relationships, but information about individual cumulative exposure would enhance the potential for risk assessment of manganese.
本综述旨在量化职业性接触锰所产生的绩效影响证据。分析了1987年至2008年间发表的流行病学研究。该方法基于效应大小估计的荟萃分析方法,旨在解决以下问题:(1)确定受影响的功能;(2)确定敏感的神经心理学测试;(3)分析接触-效应关系。荟萃分析纳入了13项研究,共涉及958名接触锰的工人和815名未接触锰的工人。可吸入锰的平均浓度范围为0.05至1.59毫克/立方米,全血中锰的平均浓度范围为8.1至48.4微克/升。对19个神经心理学绩效变量进行了分析,因为它们至少在三项已确定的研究中出现。除了两项结果外,总体效应显示锰对绩效有负面影响。六个测试变量获得了显著的总体效应;效应大小范围为d = -0.23至-0.36。其中四个变量测量运动速度,两个变量测量信息处理速度。接触-效应关系分析表明,与血液中的锰相比,效应大小与可吸入锰的较高浓度之间的关联更为一致。认知和运动绩效影响的证据与关于锰在基底神经节中的积累以及锰对神经递质多巴胺的影响的知识相符。在结果表明该生物标志物可能对神经行为改变的意义不足的背景下,讨论了效应大小与血液中锰生物标志物之间关系的不一致性。对于进一步研究,具有明显速度成分的简单运动绩效测试似乎非常值得推荐,因为它们似乎适合测量与锰相关的变化,似乎能提供同质结果,并且其结果显示与接触存在一致关系。这种严谨的定量方法特别适合揭示接触-效应关系,但关于个体累积接触的信息将增强锰风险评估的潜力。