• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

毒理学系统评价入门

A primer on systematic reviews in toxicology.

作者信息

Hoffmann Sebastian, de Vries Rob B M, Stephens Martin L, Beck Nancy B, Dirven Hubert A A M, Fowle John R, Goodman Julie E, Hartung Thomas, Kimber Ian, Lalu Manoj M, Thayer Kristina, Whaley Paul, Wikoff Daniele, Tsaioun Katya

机构信息

Evidence-Based Toxicology Collaboration at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

seh consulting + services, Paderborn, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Toxicol. 2017 Jul;91(7):2551-2575. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-1980-3. Epub 2017 May 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00204-017-1980-3
PMID:28501917
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5489636/
Abstract

Systematic reviews, pioneered in the clinical field, provide a transparent, methodologically rigorous and reproducible means of summarizing the available evidence on a precisely framed research question. Having matured to a well-established approach in many research fields, systematic reviews are receiving increasing attention as a potential tool for answering toxicological questions. In the larger framework of evidence-based toxicology, the advantages and obstacles of, as well as the approaches for, adapting and adopting systematic reviews to toxicology are still being explored. To provide the toxicology community with a starting point for conducting or understanding systematic reviews, we herein summarized available guidance documents from various fields of application. We have elaborated on the systematic review process by breaking it down into ten steps, starting with planning the project, framing the question, and writing and publishing the protocol, and concluding with interpretation and reporting. In addition, we have identified the specific methodological challenges of toxicological questions and have summarized how these can be addressed. Ultimately, this primer is intended to stimulate scientific discussions of the identified issues to fuel the development of toxicology-specific methodology and to encourage the application of systematic review methodology to toxicological issues.

摘要

系统评价发端于临床领域,提供了一种透明、方法严谨且可重复的手段,用于总结针对精确界定的研究问题的现有证据。在许多研究领域,系统评价已发展成为一种成熟的方法,作为回答毒理学问题的潜在工具,正受到越来越多的关注。在基于证据的毒理学这一更大框架下,将系统评价应用于毒理学的优势、障碍以及方法仍在探索之中。为给毒理学界提供开展或理解系统评价的起点,我们在此总结了来自各个应用领域的现有指导文件。我们通过将系统评价过程细分为十个步骤进行了详细阐述,从项目规划、问题界定、方案撰写与发表,到解释与报告。此外,我们确定了毒理学问题的具体方法挑战,并总结了应对这些挑战的方法。最终,本入门指南旨在激发对已识别问题的科学讨论,以推动毒理学特定方法的发展,并鼓励将系统评价方法应用于毒理学问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e2/5489636/fbdcf84ff88f/204_2017_1980_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e2/5489636/e252c1db83ad/204_2017_1980_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e2/5489636/a7dda0b1cdd4/204_2017_1980_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e2/5489636/fbdcf84ff88f/204_2017_1980_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e2/5489636/e252c1db83ad/204_2017_1980_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e2/5489636/a7dda0b1cdd4/204_2017_1980_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e2/5489636/fbdcf84ff88f/204_2017_1980_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A primer on systematic reviews in toxicology.毒理学系统评价入门
Arch Toxicol. 2017 Jul;91(7):2551-2575. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-1980-3. Epub 2017 May 13.
2
Evidence-based toxicology: a comprehensive framework for causation.循证毒理学:因果关系的综合框架。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2005 Apr;24(4):161-201. doi: 10.1191/0960327105ht517oa.
3
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
8
A systematic review of speech, language and communication interventions for children with Down syndrome from 0 to 6 years.对0至6岁唐氏综合征儿童言语、语言和沟通干预措施的系统评价。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Mar;57(2):441-463. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12699. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
9
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
10
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing risk of bias in toxicological studies in the era of artificial intelligence.评估人工智能时代毒理学研究中的偏倚风险。
Arch Toxicol. 2025 Aug;99(8):3065-3090. doi: 10.1007/s00204-025-03978-5.
2
Cross-mapping of terms used in chemical risk assessment with those used in systematic review: research protocol.化学风险评估中使用的术语与系统评价中使用的术语的交叉映射:研究方案。
Evid Based Toxicol. 2024;2(1). doi: 10.1080/2833373x.2024.2371285. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
3
A systematic scoping review of the neurological effects of COVID-19.

本文引用的文献

1
"A little learning is a dangerous thing": A call for better understanding of the term 'systematic review'.“一知半解是危险的”:呼吁更好地理解“系统评价”一词。
Environ Int. 2017 Feb;99:356-360. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.020. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
2
Evaluating mesenchymal stem cell therapy for sepsis with preclinical meta-analyses prior to initiating a first-in-human trial.在启动首次人体试验之前,通过临床前荟萃分析评估间充质干细胞疗法治疗脓毒症的效果。
Elife. 2016 Nov 17;5:e17850. doi: 10.7554/eLife.17850.
3
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Multiple Airborne Pollutants and Autism Spectrum Disorder.
一项关于 COVID-19 对神经系统影响的系统范围综述。
Neurotoxicology. 2024 Jul;103:16-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2024.05.003. Epub 2024 May 18.
4
Artificial intelligence (AI)-it's the end of the tox as we know it (and I feel fine).人工智能(AI)——这是我们所知道的毒理学的终结(我感觉很好)。
Arch Toxicol. 2024 Mar;98(3):735-754. doi: 10.1007/s00204-023-03666-2. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
5
Understanding target-specific effects of antidepressant drug pollution on molluscs: A systematic review protocol.理解抗抑郁药污染对软体动物的靶向特定效应:系统综述方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 27;18(6):e0287582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287582. eCollection 2023.
6
Toxic mechanism of the Mongolian medicine "Hunqile-7" based on metabonomics and the metabolism of intestinal flora.基于代谢组学和肠道菌群代谢的蒙药“浑其勒-7”毒性机制
Toxicol Res (Camb). 2022 Dec 25;12(1):49-61. doi: 10.1093/toxres/tfac081. eCollection 2023 Feb.
7
An interdisciplinary framework for derivation of occupational exposure limits.职业接触限值推导的跨学科框架。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 30;10:1038305. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1038305. eCollection 2022.
8
Avoiding Regrettable Substitutions: Green Toxicology for Sustainable Chemistry.避免令人遗憾的替代:可持续化学的绿色毒理学
ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2021 Jun 14;9(23):7749-7758. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c09435. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
9
A systematic review on the effects of nanomaterials on gut microbiota.关于纳米材料对肠道微生物群影响的系统综述。
Curr Res Microb Sci. 2022 Feb 18;3:100118. doi: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2022.100118. eCollection 2022.
10
Biological plausibility in environmental health systematic reviews: a GRADE concept paper.环境卫生系统评价中的生物学合理性:一份GRADE概念文件。
Environ Int. 2022 Apr;162:107109. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107109. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
多种空气传播污染物与自闭症谱系障碍的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 21;11(9):e0161851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161851. eCollection 2016.
4
Raising the standard of systematic reviews published in Environment International.提高发表于《环境国际》的系统评价的标准。
Environ Int. 2016 Dec;97:274-276. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
5
The Emergence of Systematic Review in Toxicology.毒理学中系统评价的出现
Toxicol Sci. 2016 Jul;152(1):10-6. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfw059. Epub 2016 May 5.
6
Guidance on assessing the methodological and reporting quality of toxicologically relevant studies: A scoping review.毒理学相关研究方法学和报告质量评估指南:范围综述。
Environ Int. 2016 Jul-Aug;92-93:630-46. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
7
GRADE: Assessing the quality of evidence in environmental and occupational health.GRADE:评估环境与职业健康领域的证据质量。
Environ Int. 2016 Jul-Aug;92-93:611-6. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
8
The relationship between study sponsorship, risks of bias, and research outcomes in atrazine exposure studies conducted in non-human animals: Systematic review and meta-analysis.非人类动物中阿特拉津暴露研究的研究资助、偏倚风险与研究结果之间的关系:系统评价与荟萃分析
Environ Int. 2016 Jul-Aug;92-93:597-604. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.10.011. Epub 2015 Dec 13.
9
Implementing systematic review techniques in chemical risk assessment: Challenges, opportunities and recommendations.将系统评价技术应用于化学风险评估:挑战、机遇和建议。
Environ Int. 2016 Jul-Aug;92-93:556-64. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
10
Determinants of the Efficacy of Cardiac Ischemic Preconditioning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Animal Studies.心脏缺血预处理疗效的决定因素:动物研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 18;10(11):e0142021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142021. eCollection 2015.