Department of Clinical Science, L. Sacco University Hospital, 20157 Milano, Italy.
Surg Endosc. 2009 Dec;23(12):2790-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0518-z. Epub 2009 May 23.
Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is theoretically useful in Crohn's disease (CD) since it is potentially able to investigate the whole small intestine, but sparse data are available.
To assess the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic yield of DBE in CD.
The study was conducted in a tertiary care centre for inflammatory bowel disease. Thirty-seven patients with CD (18/19 male/female, mean age 42 years, range 13-77 years) were considered. Thirty-two DBEs from the oral approach and 18 from the anal (in 6 patients from both ways with a complete exploration in 4, 10.8%) were performed. Indications were: first diagnosis/staging in 16 cases, diagnosis of stenosis in 7, obscure bleeding in 10, suspected neoplasia in 2, and postsurgical evaluation in 2. One hundred and thirty-three other procedures (3.7 per patient) were performed with the same indication.
Insertion depth from the oral route was 266.5 ± 100 cm and from the anal route 72.5 ± 60 cm. Ileocecal valve was passed in 8/13 patients, but in 4 DBE explored less than 50 cm of ileum. Diagnostic yield was 59.4% but changed according to indication (40% in obscure bleeding, 100% in case of strictures) and was higher when DBE was conducted on the basis of previous investigations (77.8% versus 40%, p = 0.037).
DBE is a feasible, useful, but technically demanding method in CD. Definition of the proper introduction route by means of previous investigations is associated with a higher efficacy of DBE.
双气囊内镜(DBE)在克罗恩病(CD)中具有理论上的应用价值,因为它有可能检查整个小肠,但目前的数据很少。
评估 DBE 在 CD 中的可行性、安全性和诊断效果。
该研究在一家炎症性肠病的三级护理中心进行。纳入 37 例 CD 患者(18/19 例为男性/女性,平均年龄 42 岁,范围 13-77 岁)。进行了 32 例经口 DBE 和 18 例经肛门 DBE(6 例患者同时进行两种方式,其中 4 例(10.8%)进行了完全检查)。适应证为:16 例为首次诊断/分期,7 例为狭窄诊断,10 例为不明原因出血,2 例为疑似肿瘤,2 例为术后评估。同一适应证下还进行了 133 例其他检查(每例患者 3.7 次)。
经口插入深度为 266.5±100cm,经肛门插入深度为 72.5±60cm。13 例患者中 8 例通过回盲瓣,但 4 例 DBE 检查的回肠长度不足 50cm。诊断效果为 59.4%,但根据适应证而有所不同(不明原因出血的诊断效果为 40%,狭窄的诊断效果为 100%),并且在基于先前检查进行 DBE 检查时效果更高(77.8%比 40%,p=0.037)。
DBE 是一种在 CD 中可行、有用但技术要求较高的方法。通过先前的检查来确定合适的引入途径与 DBE 的更高疗效相关。