Suppr超能文献

四种基于重组梅毒螺旋体抗原的梅毒快速诊断试验的临床评估

Clinical evaluation of four recombinant Treponema pallidum antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests for syphilis.

作者信息

Li J, Zheng H-Y, Wang L-N, Liu Y-X, Wang X-F, Liu X-R

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009 Jun;23(6):648-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2008.03102.x. Epub 2009 Mar 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and feasibility of four rapid tests in the diagnosis of syphilis in sexually transmitted disease diagnosis and treatment centre of Peking Union Medical College Hospital.

METHODS

Tests were performed on consecutive clinic attendees, using whole blood in the clinic, and whole blood and serum in the laboratory. The sensitivity and specificity of each test was evaluated, using a standard treponemal test (Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay) as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The results are as follows. Abbott Determine Syphilis TP test: for serum specimens, the sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 98.9%; for whole blood specimens, the sensitivity was 81.9% and specificity was 99.4%. SD Bioline Syphilis 3.0 test: for serum specimens, the sensitivity was 95.5% and specificity was 97.9%; for whole blood specimens, the sensitivity was 87.6% and specificity was 99.4%. VisiTect-Syphilis test: for serum specimens, the sensitivity was 94.0% and specificity was 98.1%; for whole blood specimens, the sensitivity was 73.5% and specificity was 99.7%. Syphicheck-WB test: for serum specimens, the sensitivity was 67.4% and specificity was 98.8%; for whole blood specimens, the sensitivity was 64.0% and specificity was 99.7%.

CONCLUSION

We therefore strongly believe that rapid serological tests for syphilis are an acceptable alternative to conventional laboratory tests. Since they do not require equipment or electricity, they could increase coverage of syphilis screening, and enable treatment to be given at the first clinic visit.

摘要

目的

评估四种快速检测方法在北京协和医院性传播疾病诊疗中心梅毒诊断中的敏感性、特异性及可行性。

方法

对连续就诊的患者进行检测,在门诊使用全血,在实验室使用全血和血清。以标准梅毒螺旋体检测(梅毒螺旋体血凝试验)作为金标准,评估每种检测方法的敏感性和特异性。

结果

结果如下。雅培梅毒螺旋体明胶颗粒凝集试验:血清标本,敏感性为100%,特异性为98.9%;全血标本,敏感性为81.9%,特异性为99.4%。SD生物线梅毒快速诊断试剂3.0:血清标本,敏感性为95.5%,特异性为97.9%;全血标本,敏感性为87.6%,特异性为99.4%。梅毒快速检测试剂:血清标本,敏感性为94.0%,特异性为98.1%;全血标本,敏感性为73.5%,特异性为99.7%。梅毒螺旋体抗体检测试纸条:血清标本,敏感性为67.4%,特异性为98.8%;全血标本,敏感性为64.0%,特异性为99.7%。

结论

因此,我们坚信梅毒快速血清学检测是传统实验室检测的可接受替代方法。由于它们不需要设备或电力,可扩大梅毒筛查覆盖范围,并能在首次门诊就诊时给予治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验