Bertelsen Mads F, Villadsen Lene
Centre for Zoo and Wild Animal Health, Copenhagen Zoo, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2009 Jul;36(4):328-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2009.00464.x. Epub 2009 May 12.
To evaluate the anaesthetic and cardiorespiratory effects of four anaesthetic protocols in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes).
Prospective, blinded and randomized complete block design.
Ten adult captive red foxes.
Foxes were anaesthetized by intramuscular (IM) injection using four protocols in random order: medetomidine 40 microg kg(-1), midazolam 0.3 mg kg(-1) and butorphanol 0.1 mg kg(-1) (MMiB), medetomidine 40 microg kg(-1) and ketamine 4 mg kg(-1) (MK40/4), medetomidine 60 microg kg(-1) and ketamine 4 mg kg(-1) (MK60/4), medetomidine 40 microg kg(-1) and tiletamine/zolazepam 2 mg kg(-1) (MTZ). Time to lateral recumbency, induction time and time to recovery following IM administration of atipamezole 0.2 mg kg(-1) were recorded. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate ((f)R) and rhythm, blood pressure, rectal temperature, end-tidal CO(2) tension (Pe'Co(2)), functional oxygen saturation and presence/absence of interdigital, palpebral and ear reflexes were recorded every 10 minutes, and following administration of atipamezole. Data were analysed using two-way repeated-measures anova with Bonferroni post tests; p < 0.05 was considered significant.
All protocols produced profound sedation with good muscle relaxation. Only the MMiB protocol diverged significantly from the others. Induction of anaesthesia and recovery time following atipamezole were significantly longer, and f(R) and initial HR significantly lower with MMiB than with the other protocols. With all protocols, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was initially relatively high (140-156 mmHg), and decreased significantly over time. With all protocols, the administration of atipamezole resulted in a rapid, significant decrease in MAP and an increase in HR.
All four protocols provided anaesthetic conditions suitable for minor procedures and allowed endotracheal intubation. The cyclohexanone protocols provided quicker and more reliable inductions and recoveries than the MMiB protocol.
评估四种麻醉方案对赤狐(赤狐属)的麻醉及心肺效应。
前瞻性、盲法及随机完全区组设计。
十只成年圈养赤狐。
采用四种方案通过肌肉注射对狐狸进行麻醉,顺序随机:美托咪定40微克/千克、咪达唑仑0.3毫克/千克及布托啡诺0.1毫克/千克(MMiB),美托咪定40微克/千克及氯胺酮4毫克/千克(MK40/4),美托咪定60微克/千克及氯胺酮4毫克/千克(MK60/4),美托咪定40微克/千克及替来他明/唑拉西泮2毫克/千克(MTZ)。记录肌肉注射0.2毫克/千克阿替美唑后至侧卧、诱导及恢复的时间。每10分钟及注射阿替美唑后记录心率(HR)、呼吸频率(fR)及节律、血压、直肠温度、呼气末二氧化碳分压(Pe'Co2)、功能氧饱和度以及是否存在趾间、眼睑及耳部反射。数据采用双向重复测量方差分析及Bonferroni事后检验进行分析;p < 0.05认为具有显著性。
所有方案均产生深度镇静及良好的肌肉松弛效果。只有MMiB方案与其他方案有显著差异。MMiB方案的麻醉诱导及注射阿替美唑后的恢复时间显著长于其他方案,且fR及初始HR显著低于其他方案。所有方案中,平均动脉血压(MAP)最初相对较高(140 - 156毫米汞柱),且随时间显著下降。所有方案中,注射阿替美唑导致MAP迅速显著下降及HR升高。
所有四种方案均提供了适用于小手术的麻醉条件,并允许进行气管插管。环己酮类方案比MMiB方案诱导和恢复更快且更可靠。