Suppr超能文献

氯胺酮、美托咪定、罗米非定和布托啡诺联合使用对欧洲獾(Meles meles)的麻醉效果评估。

Evaluation of the anaesthetic effects of combinations of ketamine, medetomidine, romifidine and butorphanol in European badgers (Meles meles).

作者信息

Davison Kathryn E, Hughes J M Lynne, Gormley Eamonn, Lesellier Sandrine, Costello Eamon, Corner Leigh A L

机构信息

School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, UCD Veterinary Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Vet Anaesth Analg. 2007 Nov;34(6):394-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2006.00339.x. Epub 2007 Jun 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of three anaesthetic combinations in adult European badgers (Meles meles).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, blinded, experimental trial.

ANIMALS

Sixteen captive adult badgers.

METHODS

The badgers were each anaesthetized by intramuscular injection using the three techniques assigned in random order: romifidine 0.18 mg kg(-1), ketamine 10 mg kg(-1) and butorphanol 0.1 mg kg(-1) (RKB); medetomidine 0.1 mg kg(-1), ketamine 9 mg kg(-1) and butorphanol 0.1 mg kg(-1) (MKB); and medetomidine 0.1 mg kg(-1) and ketamine 10 mg kg(-1) (MK). Initial drug doses were calculated based on a body mass of 10 kg. Additional anaesthetic requirements, time to drug effect, duration of action and recovery from anaesthesia were recorded. Heart rate and rhythm, respiratory rate and rhythm, rectal and subcutaneous microchip temperature and oxygen saturation were recorded every 5 minutes. Depth of anaesthesia was assessed using: muscle tone; palpebral and pedal reflexes; and tongue relaxation at these time points. Blood samples and a tracheal aspirate were obtained under anaesthesia. Atipamezole was administered if the badger had not recovered within 60 minutes Parametric data were analysed using anova for repeated measures, and nonparametric data using Friedman's, and Cochran's Q tests: p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

All combinations produced good or excellent muscle relaxation throughout the anaesthetic period. RKB had the shortest duration of anaesthesia (16.8 minutes compared with MKB 25.9 minutes and MK 25.5 minutes) and antagonism was not required. RKB depressed respiratory rate less than MK and MKB. There was no significant difference between techniques for heart rate and rhythm.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

All combinations provided anaesthetic conditions suitable for sampling and identification procedures in adult badgers. The RKB protocol provided a significantly shorter period of anaesthesia when compared with the combinations containing medetomidine.

摘要

目的

评估三种麻醉组合对成年欧洲獾(鼬獾)的效果。

研究设计

前瞻性、随机、双盲实验性试验。

动物

16只圈养成年獾。

方法

使用三种技术通过肌肉注射对獾进行麻醉,这三种技术按随机顺序分配:罗米芬0.18毫克/千克、氯胺酮10毫克/千克和布托啡诺0.1毫克/千克(RKB);美托咪定0.1毫克/千克、氯胺酮9毫克/千克和布托啡诺0.1毫克/千克(MKB);美托咪定0.1毫克/千克和氯胺酮10毫克/千克(MK)。初始药物剂量根据10千克体重计算。记录额外的麻醉需求、药物起效时间、作用持续时间和麻醉苏醒时间。每5分钟记录心率和心律、呼吸频率和心律、直肠和皮下微芯片温度以及血氧饱和度。在这些时间点使用肌肉张力、眼睑和足趾反射以及舌头松弛情况评估麻醉深度。在麻醉状态下采集血样和气管吸出物。如果獾在60分钟内未苏醒,则给予阿替美唑。参数数据使用重复测量方差分析进行分析,非参数数据使用弗里德曼检验和 Cochr an Q检验:p<0.05被认为具有显著性。

结果

在整个麻醉期间,所有组合均产生良好或极佳的肌肉松弛效果。RKB的麻醉持续时间最短(16.8分钟,而MKB为25.9分钟,MK为25.5分钟),且无需拮抗。RKB对呼吸频率的抑制小于MK和MKB。各技术在心率和心律方面无显著差异。

结论及临床意义

所有组合均提供了适合成年獾采样和识别程序的麻醉条件。与含美托咪定的组合相比,RKB方案的麻醉时间明显更短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验