Clément-Ziza Mathieu, Gentien David, Lyonnet Stanislas, Thiery Jean-Paul, Besmond Claude, Decraene Charles
Institut Curie, Département de Transfert, 26 Rue d'ULM, F-75248, Paris cedex 05, France.
BMC Genomics. 2009 May 26;10:246. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-246.
For more than a decade, microarrays have been a powerful and widely used tool to explore the transcriptome of biological systems. However, the amount of biological material from cell sorting or laser capture microdissection is much too small to perform microarray studies. To address this issue, RNA amplification methods have been developed to generate sufficient targets from picogram amounts of total RNA to perform microarray hybridisation.
In this study, four commercial protocols for amplification of picograms amounts of input RNA for microarray expression profiling were evaluated and compared. The quantitative and qualitative performances of the methods were assessed. Microarrays were hybridised with the amplified targets and the amplification protocols were compared with respect to the quality of expression profiles, reproducibility within a concentration range of input RNA, and sensitivity. The results demonstrate significant differences between these four methods.
In our hands, the WT-Ovation pico system proposed by Nugen appears to be the most suitable for RNA amplification. This comparative study will be useful to scientists needing to choose an amplification method to carry out microarray experiments involving samples comprising only a few cells and generating picogram amounts of RNA.
十多年来,微阵列一直是探索生物系统转录组的强大且广泛使用的工具。然而,通过细胞分选或激光捕获显微切割获得的生物材料量太少,无法进行微阵列研究。为了解决这个问题,已开发出RNA扩增方法,以从皮克量的总RNA中生成足够的靶标来进行微阵列杂交。
在本研究中,对用于微阵列表达谱分析的皮克量输入RNA扩增的四种商业方案进行了评估和比较。评估了这些方法的定量和定性性能。将微阵列与扩增的靶标进行杂交,并就表达谱的质量、输入RNA浓度范围内的重现性和灵敏度对扩增方案进行了比较。结果表明这四种方法之间存在显著差异。
在我们看来,Nugen公司提出的WT-Ovation pico系统似乎最适合RNA扩增。这项比较研究将对需要选择扩增方法来进行涉及仅包含少量细胞且产生皮克量RNA的样本的微阵列实验的科学家有用。