Whitten Pamela, Holtz Bree, Meyer Emily, Nazione Samantha
Department of Telecommunication, Information Studies and Media, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15(4):187-90. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2009.080911.
We investigated why hospice nurses were slow to adopt videophones to care for their patients. We used the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model and the organizational readiness for change (ORC) assessment via interviews and focus groups with hospice staff. Twenty-five hospice employees participated. Eighteen (72%) were in clinical positions and seven were in non-clinical positions (28%). Thirty-nine percent of respondents reported no videophone training, despite the fact that every employee had received training. Only four staff members actually used a videophone with patients. The respondents overwhelmingly stated that they had the organizational resources necessary to use the videophone and that it was easy to operate. Despite initial enthusiasm, leaders in the hospice agency did not endorse the videophones for work, nor offer incentives for using the videophones or providing them to patients. It is important to note that videophone technology is not meant to replace face-to-face visits, but to supplement them and to provide an additional tool for the nurses.
我们调查了临终关怀护士为何迟迟不采用可视电话来护理患者。我们通过与临终关怀机构工作人员进行访谈和焦点小组讨论,运用技术接受与使用统一理论(UTAUT)模型以及组织变革准备度(ORC)评估。25名临终关怀机构员工参与其中。18人(72%)担任临床职位,7人担任非临床职位(28%)。尽管每位员工都接受过培训,但39%的受访者表示未接受过可视电话培训。实际上只有4名员工使用可视电话为患者服务。受访者压倒性地表示,他们拥有使用可视电话所需的组织资源,并且其操作简便。尽管起初热情高涨,但临终关怀机构的领导并未认可将可视电话用于工作,也未提供使用可视电话或为患者配备可视电话的激励措施。需要注意的是,可视电话技术并非旨在取代面对面探访,而是对其进行补充,并为护士提供一种额外工具。