Suppr超能文献

基于四环素的三联或四联疗法与幽门螺杆菌治疗的标准三联疗法对比

Triple or quadruple tetracycline-based therapies versus standard triple treatment for Helicobacter pylori treatment.

作者信息

Songür Yildiran, Senol Altuğ, Balkarli Ayşe, Baştürk Abdülkadir, Cerçi Süreyya

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Süleyman Demirel University School of Medicine, Isparta, Turkey.

出版信息

Am J Med Sci. 2009 Jul;338(1):50-3. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31819c7320.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to compare lansoprazole-tetracycline-metranidazole (LTM) as first-line treatment with the classical lansoprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin (LAC) and bismuth-containing quadruple treatments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective, single-center, randomized study included 464 consecutive Helicobacter pylori-positive patients with dyspeptic symptoms. A total of 415 patients completed the study. The patients were allocated into 4 study groups using random sampling numbers as follows-LAC group: lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily, and clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 14 days; BLTM group: bismuth subcitrate 300 mg 4 times a day, lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, tetracycline 500 mg 4 times a day, and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily for 10 days; RBLTM group: ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg twice daily, lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, tetracycline 500 mg 4 times a day, and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily for 10 days; and LTM group: lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, tetracycline 500 mg 4 times a day, and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily for 10 days.

RESULTS

The per protocol H. pylori eradication rate in LAC, BLTM, RBLTM, and LTM groups were 37 of 104 (35.6%), 56 of 102 (54.9%), 67 of 104 (64.4%), and 63 of 105 (60%), respectively. The intention-to-treat eradication rate was 37 of 113 (32.7%) in LAC, 56 of 119 (47.1%) in BLTM, 67 of 117 (57.3%) in RBLTM, and 63 of 115 (54.8%) in LTM group. The BLTM, RBLTM, and LTM treatment groups achieved a significantly better eradication rate than the LAC treatment group (P < 0.001). There was not any significant statistical difference between the groups of BLTM, RBLTM, and LTM.

CONCLUSION

LTM treatment group achieved a significantly better eradication rate than the LAC treatment group. The success ratio of LTM therapy is comparable with quadruple bismuth-based treatments.

摘要

背景

我们的目的是比较兰索拉唑-四环素-甲硝唑(LTM)作为一线治疗方案与传统的兰索拉唑-阿莫西林-克拉霉素(LAC)及含铋四联疗法。

患者与方法

这项前瞻性、单中心、随机研究纳入了464例连续的有消化不良症状的幽门螺杆菌阳性患者。共有415例患者完成了研究。使用随机抽样数字将患者分为4个研究组,如下所示:LAC组:兰索拉唑30毫克,每日2次;阿莫西林1000毫克,每日2次;克拉霉素500毫克,每日2次,疗程14天;BLTM组:枸橼酸铋300毫克,每日4次;兰索拉唑30毫克,每日2次;四环素500毫克,每日4次;甲硝唑500毫克,每日2次,疗程10天;RBLTM组:枸橼酸铋雷尼替丁400毫克,每日2次;兰索拉唑30毫克,每日2次;四环素500毫克,每日4次;甲硝唑500毫克,每日2次,疗程10天;LTM组:兰索拉唑30毫克,每日2次;四环素500毫克,每日4次;甲硝唑500毫克,每日2次,疗程10天。

结果

按方案分析,LAC组、BLTM组、RBLTM组和LTM组的幽门螺杆菌根除率分别为104例中的37例(35.6%)、102例中的56例(54.9%)、104例中的67例(64.4%)和105例中的63例(60%)。意向性分析的根除率在LAC组为113例中的37例(32.7%),BLTM组为119例中的56例(47.1%),RBLTM组为117例中的67例(57.3%),LTM组为115例中的63例(54.8%)。BLTM组、RBLTM组和LTM治疗组的根除率显著高于LAC治疗组(P<0.001)。BLTM组、RBLTM组和LTM组之间无显著统计学差异。

结论

LTM治疗组的根除率显著高于LAC治疗组。LTM疗法的成功率与含铋四联疗法相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验