Suppr超能文献

黑腹果蝇蛋白质陷阱筛选中的偏差

Biases in Drosophila melanogaster protein trap screens.

作者信息

Aleksic Jelena, Lazic Ranko, Müller Ilka, Russell Steven R, Adryan Boris

机构信息

Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

BMC Genomics. 2009 May 28;10:249. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-249.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ability to localise or follow endogenous proteins in real time in vivo is of tremendous utility for cell biology or systems biology studies. Protein trap screens utilise the random genomic insertion of a transposon-borne artificial reporter exon (e.g. encoding the green fluorescent protein, GFP) into an intron of an endogenous gene to generate a fluorescent fusion protein. Despite recent efforts aimed at achieving comprehensive coverage of the genes encoded in the Drosophila genome, the repertoire of genes that yield protein traps is still small.

RESULTS

We analysed the collection of available protein trap lines in Drosophila melanogaster and identified potential biases that are likely to restrict genome coverage in protein trap screens. The protein trap screens investigated here primarily used P-element vectors and thus exhibit some of the same positional biases associated with this transposon that are evident from the comprehensive Drosophila Gene Disruption Project. We further found that protein trap target genes usually exhibit broad and persistent expression during embryonic development, which is likely to facilitate better detection. In addition, we investigated the likely influence of the GFP exon on host protein structure and found that protein trap insertions have a significant bias for exon-exon boundaries that encode disordered protein regions. 38.8% of GFP insertions land in disordered protein regions compared with only 23.4% in the case of non-trapping P-element insertions landing in coding sequence introns (p < 10(-4)). Interestingly, even in cases where protein domains are predicted, protein trap insertions frequently occur in regions encoding surface exposed areas that are likely to be functionally neutral. Considering the various biases observed, we predict that less than one third of intron-containing genes are likely to be amenable to trapping by the existing methods.

CONCLUSION

Our analyses suggest that the utility of P-element vectors for protein trap screens has largely been exhausted, and that approximately 2,800 genes may still be amenable using piggyBac vectors. Thus protein trap strategies based on current approaches are unlikely to offer true genome-wide coverage. We suggest that either transposons with reduced insertion bias or recombineering-based targeting techniques will be required for comprehensive genome coverage in Drosophila.

摘要

背景

在体内实时定位或追踪内源性蛋白质的能力对于细胞生物学或系统生物学研究具有巨大的实用价值。蛋白质陷阱筛选利用转座子携带的人工报告外显子(如编码绿色荧光蛋白,GFP)随机基因组插入到内源性基因的内含子中,以产生荧光融合蛋白。尽管最近致力于全面覆盖果蝇基因组中编码的基因,但产生蛋白质陷阱的基因库仍然很小。

结果

我们分析了黑腹果蝇中可用的蛋白质陷阱品系的集合,并确定了可能限制蛋白质陷阱筛选中基因组覆盖范围的潜在偏差。这里研究的蛋白质陷阱筛选主要使用P-元素载体,因此表现出一些与该转座子相关的相同位置偏差,这在全面的果蝇基因破坏项目中很明显。我们进一步发现,蛋白质陷阱靶基因通常在胚胎发育过程中表现出广泛而持续的表达,这可能有助于更好地检测。此外,我们研究了GFP外显子对宿主蛋白质结构的可能影响,发现蛋白质陷阱插入对编码无序蛋白质区域的外显子-外显子边界有显著偏差。38.8%的GFP插入落在无序蛋白质区域,而在编码序列内含子中着陆的非陷阱P-元素插入的情况下,这一比例仅为23.4%(p < 10(-4))。有趣的是,即使在预测蛋白质结构域的情况下,蛋白质陷阱插入也经常发生在编码可能功能中性的表面暴露区域的区域。考虑到观察到的各种偏差,我们预测不到三分之一的含内含子基因可能适合用现有方法捕获。

结论

我们的分析表明,P-元素载体用于蛋白质陷阱筛选的效用在很大程度上已经耗尽,使用piggyBac载体大约2800个基因可能仍然适合。因此,基于当前方法的蛋白质陷阱策略不太可能提供真正的全基因组覆盖。我们建议,要么使用插入偏差较小的转座子,要么使用基于重组工程的靶向技术,才能在果蝇中实现全面的基因组覆盖。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验