Lenhard Miriam S, Mitterer Stefanie, Kümper Carolin, Stieber Petra, Mayr Doris, Ditsch Nina, Friese Klaus, Burges Alexander
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Aug;145(2):189-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.04.031. Epub 2009 May 23.
To assess long-term survival and relapse rate of patients diagnosed with a borderline tumor of the ovary (BOT) with special focus on the influence of primary surgery.
All women diagnosed and treated for BOT between 1983 and 2006 at our institution were included in this retrospective study. Clinical data including operative procedure, stage and histology at first diagnosis as well as follow-up data were analyzed with reference to survival times and relapse rates.
Altogether 113 patients could be identified, including 19 women treated with fertility sparing surgery (19.2%). Mean follow-up time was 9.6+/-6.6 years. Relapse occurred during the follow-up period in 10 patients (10.1%) with a mean time to recurrence of 2.0+/-1.7 years. Patients with recurrent disease had a statistically significantly worse survival: 5- and 10-year survival rates were 90.0 and 80.0% compared with 98.9 and 94.4% for those without (p=0.0208), respectively. Relapse rate was 7.1% in early borderline patients (Ia: 4/56) and 14% (>Ia: 6/43) for all others (p=0.436). Patients with invasive implants had a statistically significantly higher relapse rate (p=0.0112). No significant difference in relapse rates or survival was observed between the histological subtypes. Five- and 10-year survival rates of women treated with fertility sparing surgery (n=19) were 100% and thus not worse than those of radically operated patients (5- and 10-year survival 95.1 and 90.1%). Relapse rates in both groups were comparable with 10.5 and 10.0% (p=0.723). The surgical procedure with lymphadenectomy vs. without had no influence on relapse or survival, neither did laparoscopy vs. laparotomy.
Our findings confirm the good prognosis of BOT in general. Patients with invasive implants have higher relapse rates. Fertility sparing surgery in women at childbearing age can be an adequate treatment option in early stage disease.
评估诊断为卵巢交界性肿瘤(BOT)患者的长期生存率和复发率,特别关注初次手术的影响。
本回顾性研究纳入了1983年至2006年期间在我院诊断并接受BOT治疗的所有女性。分析了包括初次诊断时的手术操作、分期和组织学以及随访数据等临床资料,以了解生存时间和复发率。
共确定了113例患者,其中19例(19.2%)接受了保留生育功能手术。平均随访时间为9.6±6.6年。随访期间10例患者(10.1%)复发,平均复发时间为2.0±1.7年。复发患者的生存率在统计学上显著较差:5年和10年生存率分别为90.0%和80.0%,而未复发患者分别为98.9%和94.4%(p=0.0208)。早期交界性患者(Ia期:4/56)的复发率为7.1%,其他所有患者(>Ia期:6/43)的复发率为14%(p=0.436)。有浸润性种植灶的患者复发率在统计学上显著更高(p=0.0112)。组织学亚型之间在复发率或生存率方面未观察到显著差异。接受保留生育功能手术的女性(n=19)的5年和10年生存率均为100%,因此并不比接受根治性手术的患者差(5年和10年生存率分别为95.1%和90.1%)。两组的复发率相当,分别为10.5%和10.0%(p=0.723)。进行淋巴结清扫术与未进行淋巴结清扫术的手术方式对复发或生存均无影响,腹腔镜手术与开腹手术也是如此。
我们的研究结果证实了BOT总体预后良好。有浸润性种植灶的患者复发率更高。对于育龄期女性,保留生育功能手术在早期疾病中可以是一种合适的治疗选择。