• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伴有非侵袭性种植的卵巢浆液性交界性肿瘤的复发率和总生存率与时间相关。

The recurrence and the overall survival rates of ovarian serous borderline neoplasms with noninvasive implants is time dependent.

作者信息

Silva Elvio G, Gershenson David M, Malpica Anais, Deavers Michael

机构信息

Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg Pathol. 2006 Nov;30(11):1367-71. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213294.81154.95.

DOI:10.1097/01.pas.0000213294.81154.95
PMID:17063075
Abstract

Ovarian serous borderline neoplasm with noninvasive implants traditionally have been considered to be nonaggressive tumors associated with an excellent prognosis. However, in our experience, recurrences commonly develop as patients are followed over many years. Eighty cases of advanced-stage ovarian serous borderline tumor with noninvasive implants were identified; the minimum follow-up period for these cases was 5 years or until the death of the patient. The following cases were excluded: patients treated by cystectomy, patients who died of other causes, patients who developed other tumors, and patients who had as the only positive material after resection of the primary borderline neoplasm a tumor detected on a second look or third look operation. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides from the original ovarian tumor and the staging biopsies were reviewed in all cases. Slides of the recurrent tumor were available in all cases except for 2 in which the diagnosis was established clinically. The presence or absence of a micropapillary/cribriform pattern and microinvasion in the ovarian tumor was recorded. Follow-up was obtained from the patients' charts. Fischer exact test was used for statistical analysis. The patients' ages ranged from 17 to 67 years (median 36 y). Seventy-three patients were treated by total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Seven patients were treated by total abdominal hysterectomy and unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage was as follows: stage II (29 cases), stage III (50 cases), and stage IV (1 case). After surgery, 58 patients were treated with chemotherapy, 7 with radiotherapy, and 1 with hormonal therapy. The follow-up ranged from 5 to 31 years (median 15.7 y). Thirty-five patients (44%) developed recurrences. Only 10% of the patients had a recurrence in less than 5 years, 19% had their recurrences between 5 and 10 years, 10% between 10 and 15 years, and 5% more than 15 years after resection of the primary neoplasm. The only statistically significant feature associated with recurrence was the presence of a micropapillary/cribriform pattern, although this pattern was present in only 26% of the cases that recurred. Of the 35 patients who had a recurrence, 2 were diagnosed clinically, both are alive with progressive disease at 1 and 5 years after the diagnosis of the recurrence; 6 had recurrent serous borderline tumors, all are without evidence of disease with a follow-up ranging from 7 to 18 years after resection of the ovarian borderline tumor (median 14 y); and 27 patients subsequently developed low-grade serous carcinoma, 7 are alive with progressive disease with a follow-up ranging from 10 to 29 years (median 15 y) and 20 died of disease between 3 to 25 years after resection of the ovarian borderline tumor (median 16 y). In summary, the true recurrence rate of ovarian serous borderline tumors with noninvasive implants can only be obtained through a long follow-up. In this group of patients, 77% and 34% of the subsequent tumors developed 5 years and 10 years after diagnosis of the ovarian tumor, respectively. Histologic examination of the recurrent tumor is important in determining further therapy and prognosis for these patients; all patients who recurred with borderline tumor are without evidence of disease, whereas 74% of the patients who recurred with low-grade serous carcinoma died of disease. We propose that patients be followed for a minimum of 10 years to evaluate for recurrences and for 20 years to evaluate for survival.

摘要

传统上,伴有非侵袭性种植灶的卵巢浆液性交界性肿瘤被认为是侵袭性低的肿瘤,预后良好。然而,根据我们的经验,随着患者多年的随访,复发情况很常见。我们确定了80例伴有非侵袭性种植灶的晚期卵巢浆液性交界性肿瘤患者;这些病例的最短随访期为5年或直至患者死亡。以下病例被排除:接受囊肿切除术治疗的患者、死于其他原因的患者、发生其他肿瘤的患者,以及在初次交界性肿瘤切除后,二次探查或三次探查手术中发现肿瘤是唯一阳性物质的患者。所有病例均复查了原始卵巢肿瘤及分期活检的苏木精-伊红染色切片。除2例临床确诊的病例外,所有复发病例均有复发肿瘤切片。记录卵巢肿瘤中微乳头/筛状结构及微浸润的有无。从患者病历中获取随访信息。采用Fisher精确检验进行统计分析。患者年龄范围为17至67岁(中位年龄36岁)。73例患者接受了全腹子宫切除术及双侧输卵管卵巢切除术。7例患者接受了全腹子宫切除术及单侧输卵管卵巢切除术。国际妇产科联盟分期如下:Ⅱ期(29例)、Ⅲ期(50例)、Ⅳ期(1例)。术后,58例患者接受了化疗,7例接受了放疗,1例接受了激素治疗。随访时间为5至31年(中位时间15.7年)。35例患者(44%)出现复发。只有10%的患者在不到5年时复发,19%的患者在5至10年之间复发,10%在10至15年之间复发,5%在初次肿瘤切除15年之后复发。与复发相关的唯一具有统计学意义的特征是微乳头/筛状结构的存在,尽管只有26%的复发病例存在这种结构。在35例复发患者中,2例为临床诊断,诊断复发后1年和5年时均存活且病情进展;6例复发为浆液性交界性肿瘤,切除卵巢交界性肿瘤后随访7至18年(中位时间14年),均无疾病证据;27例患者随后发展为低级别浆液性癌,7例存活且病情进展,随访时间为10至29年(中位时间15年),20例在切除卵巢交界性肿瘤后3至25年之间死于疾病(中位时间16年)。总之,伴有非侵袭性种植灶的卵巢浆液性交界性肿瘤的真实复发率只能通过长期随访获得。在这组患者中,分别有77%和34%的后续肿瘤在卵巢肿瘤诊断后5年和10年时出现。复发病例的组织学检查对于确定这些患者的进一步治疗及预后很重要;所有复发为交界性肿瘤的患者均无疾病证据,而复发为低级别浆液性癌的患者中有74%死于疾病。我们建议对患者至少随访10年以评估复发情况,随访20年以评估生存情况。

相似文献

1
The recurrence and the overall survival rates of ovarian serous borderline neoplasms with noninvasive implants is time dependent.伴有非侵袭性种植的卵巢浆液性交界性肿瘤的复发率和总生存率与时间相关。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2006 Nov;30(11):1367-71. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213294.81154.95.
2
Lymph node involvement in ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential: a clinicopathologic study of thirty-six cases.低度恶性潜能卵巢浆液性肿瘤的淋巴结累及:36 例临床病理研究。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Jan;34(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181c0a5ab.
3
Ovarian intestinal type mucinous borderline tumors: are we ready for a nomenclature change?卵巢肠型黏液性交界性肿瘤:我们是否准备好进行命名法的改变?
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2010 Mar;29(2):108-12. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e3181bc2706.
4
Ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential with nodal low-grade serous carcinoma.低恶性潜能的卵巢浆液性肿瘤伴淋巴结低级别浆液性癌。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Jul;36(7):955-63. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31825793e1.
5
Ovarian nonsmall cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 11 cases.卵巢非小细胞神经内分泌癌:11例临床病理及免疫组化研究
Am J Surg Pathol. 2007 May;31(5):774-82. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213422.53750.d1.
6
[Treatment and prognostic analysis of ovarian cancer patients with isolated region of lymph node recurrence].[孤立区域淋巴结复发的卵巢癌患者的治疗及预后分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Dec;47(12):928-33.
7
Ovarian serous borderline tumors with invasive peritoneal implants.伴有侵袭性腹膜种植的卵巢浆液性交界性肿瘤
Cancer. 1998 Mar 15;82(6):1096-103.
8
[Clinical behavior of serous and mucinous borderline tumors of the ovary with diploid DNA stem line. Follow-up studies after organ preserving and non-organ preserving therapy].[具有二倍体DNA干细胞系的卵巢浆液性和黏液性交界性肿瘤的临床行为。保留器官和非保留器官治疗后的随访研究]
Zentralbl Gynakol. 2000;122(5):274-9.
9
[Clinicopathologic analysis and expression of cyclin D1 and p53 of ovarian borderline tumors and carcinomas].卵巢交界性肿瘤和癌的临床病理分析及细胞周期蛋白D1和p53的表达
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Apr;42(4):227-32.
10
Ovarian papillary serous tumors of low malignant potential (serous borderline tumors). A long-term follow-up study, including patients with microinvasion, lymph node metastasis, and transformation to invasive serous carcinoma.卵巢低恶性潜能乳头状浆液性肿瘤(浆液性交界性肿瘤)。一项长期随访研究,纳入了有微浸润、淋巴结转移及转化为浸润性浆液性癌的患者。
Cancer. 1996 Jul 15;78(2):278-86. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960715)78:2<278::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO;2-T.

引用本文的文献

1
The Ultrasonography Characteristics of Borderline Ovarian Tumor Subtypes.卵巢交界性肿瘤各亚型的超声特征
J Ultrasound Med. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1002/jum.16756.
2
A Rare Case of Ovarian Serous Borderline Tumor Recurrence with Muscle Metastasis.卵巢浆液性交界性肿瘤复发伴肌肉转移1例罕见病例
Am J Case Rep. 2025 Apr 3;26:e946680. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.946680.
3
Laparoscopic Fertility-Sparing Management of Borderline Ovarian Tumors: Surgical and Long-Term Oncological Outcomes.腹腔镜保留生育功能治疗卵巢交界性肿瘤:手术及长期肿瘤学结局
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 14;13(18):5458. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185458.
4
Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: expert consensus report on the state of the science.低级别浆液性卵巢癌:科学现状的专家共识报告。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 Sep 4;33(9):1331-1344. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004610.
5
Ovarian serous borderline tumors with recurrent or extraovarian lesions: a Japanese, retrospective, multi-institutional, population-based study.伴有复发性或卵巢外病变的卵巢浆液性交界性肿瘤:一项基于日本人群的多机构回顾性研究。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct;28(10):1411-1420. doi: 10.1007/s10147-023-02393-z. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
6
Conservative treatment of borderline ovarian tumors: a retrospective study.卵巢交界性肿瘤的保守治疗:一项回顾性研究。
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2023 Apr-Jun;64(2):143-150. doi: 10.47162/RJME.64.2.03.
7
Identifying Borderline Ovarian Tumor Recurrence Using Routine Ultrasound Follow-Up.使用常规超声随访识别卵巢交界性肿瘤复发
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 22;15(1):73. doi: 10.3390/cancers15010073.
8
Ovarian Cancer-Cell Pericellular Hyaluronan Deposition Negatively Impacts Prognosis of Ovarian Cancer Patients.卵巢癌细胞周透明质酸沉积对卵巢癌患者预后产生负面影响。
Biomedicines. 2022 Nov 16;10(11):2944. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10112944.
9
Management of borderline ovarian tumors: A tertiary referral center experience in Egypt.交界性卵巢肿瘤的管理:埃及一家三级转诊中心的经验
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 2;9:962820. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.962820. eCollection 2022.
10
Salpingo-oophorectomy versus cystectomy in patients with borderline ovarian tumors: a systemic review and meta-analysis on postoperative recurrence and fertility.保留生育功能的卵巢交界性肿瘤患者行保留输卵管-卵巢切除术与单纯肿瘤剔除术的疗效比较:一项基于术后复发和生育结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr 21;19(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02241-2.