Beecham J, Knapp M, Fenyo A
Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
Schizophr Bull. 1991;17(3):427-39. doi: 10.1093/schbul/17.3.427.
There is a tendency in discussions of mental health policy and psychiatric practice to talk of the cost of a treatment, facility, or policy and to ignore variations. These variations can be considerable, which alone suggests they should not be overlooked, and they can be explored and perhaps exploited to improve the delivery of services. This article describes a theoretical framework for the examination of cost differences, applies it to a particularly rich data base on people with long-term mental health problems moving from hospital to the community, and uses the empirical evidence to address four key policy questions. The study finds encouragingly strong positive associations between costs, needs, and outcomes. It also uncovers significant cost-effectiveness differences between the public and private sectors and between community accommodation types.
在心理健康政策和精神病学实践的讨论中,存在一种倾向,即只谈论治疗、设施或政策的成本,而忽略差异。这些差异可能相当大,这本身就表明不应忽视它们,而且可以对其进行探究,甚至加以利用以改善服务的提供。本文描述了一个用于审视成本差异的理论框架,并将其应用于一个关于有长期心理健康问题的人从医院转到社区的特别丰富的数据库,还利用实证证据来回答四个关键政策问题。该研究发现,成本、需求和结果之间存在令人鼓舞的强烈正相关关系。它还揭示了公共部门和私营部门之间以及社区住宿类型之间存在显著的成本效益差异。