Suppr超能文献

[家庭医学门诊先前预约的成本效益]

[Cost-effectiveness of the previous appointment in family medicine outpatient clinics].

作者信息

Blanco Castillo Leticia, Villarreal Ríos Enrique, Vargas Daza Emma Rosa, Galicia Rodríguez Liliana, Martínez González Leo Lidia, Mejía Damián Alberto F

机构信息

Unidad de Investigación Epidemiológica y en Servicios de Salud Querétaro, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Querétaro, México; Unidad de Medicina Familiar N.(o) 16 Dr. Arturo Guerrero Ortiz, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Querétaro, México.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2009 Jun;41(6):329-34. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2008.09.020. Epub 2009 May 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of the previous appointment.

DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness study.

SETTING

Family Medicine Unit in the Mexican Public Health System, in March and April 2008.

PARTICIPANTS

All Family Medicine outpatient clinic offices who use the appointment system were included (n=32).

MEASUREMENTS

The productivity, doctor and user dimensions were analysed in the two shifts (morning and evening) operated by the Unit. Productivity included the percentage of appointments (appointment requested more than 12h before the visit), spontaneous users, those seen and cancellations; the cost was adjusted for productivity. Effectiveness was measured using doctor and patient satisfaction, on a scale from 1 to 10. The cost-effectiveness analysis took into account the perspective of the patient and the doctor in the different scenarios that considered the percentage of previous appointments. The evaluation included an incremental analysis.

RESULTS

For the doctor, the best cost-effectiveness is in the scenario of 60% previous appointments, and the worst with 50% previous appointments. The cost differences in the incremental analysis by scenarios is 15,019 euro and 76,611 euro. From the perspective of the patient (n=96), the best cost-effectiveness is in the 70% previous appointment scenario, while the worst is the one with 50%. The incremental analysis with differences by scenarios is 5,248 euro and 330,293 euro.

CONCLUSIONS

The best cost-effectiveness of the previous appointment is achieved with appointment percentages between 60 and 70%.

摘要

目的

确定之前预约的成本效益。

设计

成本效益研究。

地点

墨西哥公共卫生系统的家庭医学科,2008年3月和4月。

参与者

所有使用预约系统的家庭医学门诊办公室(n = 32)。

测量

对该科室运营的两个班次(上午和晚上)的生产力、医生和用户维度进行分析。生产力包括预约百分比(就诊前12小时以上预约)、自发就诊者、就诊者和取消预约者;成本根据生产力进行调整。使用1至10分的量表来衡量医生和患者的满意度,以此评估有效性。成本效益分析考虑了患者和医生在不同预约百分比情况下的观点。评估包括增量分析。

结果

对于医生而言,预约百分比为60%的情况下成本效益最佳,50%的情况下最差。不同情况下增量分析的成本差异为15,019欧元和76,611欧元。从患者角度(n = 96)来看,预约百分比为70%的情况下成本效益最佳,50%的情况下最差。不同情况下增量分析的差异为5,248欧元和330,293欧元。

结论

预约百分比在60%至70%之间时,之前预约的成本效益最佳。

相似文献

1
[Cost-effectiveness of the previous appointment in family medicine outpatient clinics].
Aten Primaria. 2009 Jun;41(6):329-34. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2008.09.020. Epub 2009 May 31.
3
Designing schedule configuration of a hybrid appointment system for a two-stage outpatient clinic with multiple servers.
Health Care Manag Sci. 2020 Sep;23(3):360-386. doi: 10.1007/s10729-019-09501-4. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
4
A dynamic approach for outpatient scheduling.
J Med Econ. 2017 Aug;20(8):786-798. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1318755. Epub 2017 May 15.
5
Cost-effectiveness of shared medical appointments for neuromuscular patients.
Neurology. 2015 Aug 18;85(7):619-25. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001857. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
8
9
Rural Ambulatory Access for Semi-Urgent Care and the Relationship of Distance to an Emergency Department.
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;16(4):594-9. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.4.25485. Epub 2015 Jun 24.

本文引用的文献

1
[Health care satisfaction. From the perspective of patients].
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2008 Mar-Apr;46(2):129-34.
2
[Knowledge of medical doctors about health economics].
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2007 Jul-Aug;45(4):343-52.
4
How the philosophies, styles, and methods of family medicine affect the research agenda.
Ann Fam Med. 2004 May 26;2 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S41-4. doi: 10.1370/afm.195.
6
Guidelines for the clinical and economic evaluation of health care technologies.
Soc Sci Med. 1986;22(4):393-408. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90046-8.
7
Clinical economics. A guide to the economic analysis of clinical practices.
JAMA. 1989 Nov 24;262(20):2879-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.262.20.2879.
8
A clinician's guide to cost-effectiveness analysis.
Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jul 15;113(2):147-54. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-2-147.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验