Blanco Castillo Leticia, Villarreal Ríos Enrique, Vargas Daza Emma Rosa, Galicia Rodríguez Liliana, Martínez González Leo Lidia, Mejía Damián Alberto F
Unidad de Investigación Epidemiológica y en Servicios de Salud Querétaro, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Querétaro, México; Unidad de Medicina Familiar N.(o) 16 Dr. Arturo Guerrero Ortiz, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Querétaro, México.
Aten Primaria. 2009 Jun;41(6):329-34. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2008.09.020. Epub 2009 May 31.
To determine the cost-effectiveness of the previous appointment.
Cost-effectiveness study.
Family Medicine Unit in the Mexican Public Health System, in March and April 2008.
All Family Medicine outpatient clinic offices who use the appointment system were included (n=32).
The productivity, doctor and user dimensions were analysed in the two shifts (morning and evening) operated by the Unit. Productivity included the percentage of appointments (appointment requested more than 12h before the visit), spontaneous users, those seen and cancellations; the cost was adjusted for productivity. Effectiveness was measured using doctor and patient satisfaction, on a scale from 1 to 10. The cost-effectiveness analysis took into account the perspective of the patient and the doctor in the different scenarios that considered the percentage of previous appointments. The evaluation included an incremental analysis.
For the doctor, the best cost-effectiveness is in the scenario of 60% previous appointments, and the worst with 50% previous appointments. The cost differences in the incremental analysis by scenarios is 15,019 euro and 76,611 euro. From the perspective of the patient (n=96), the best cost-effectiveness is in the 70% previous appointment scenario, while the worst is the one with 50%. The incremental analysis with differences by scenarios is 5,248 euro and 330,293 euro.
The best cost-effectiveness of the previous appointment is achieved with appointment percentages between 60 and 70%.
确定之前预约的成本效益。
成本效益研究。
墨西哥公共卫生系统的家庭医学科,2008年3月和4月。
所有使用预约系统的家庭医学门诊办公室(n = 32)。
对该科室运营的两个班次(上午和晚上)的生产力、医生和用户维度进行分析。生产力包括预约百分比(就诊前12小时以上预约)、自发就诊者、就诊者和取消预约者;成本根据生产力进行调整。使用1至10分的量表来衡量医生和患者的满意度,以此评估有效性。成本效益分析考虑了患者和医生在不同预约百分比情况下的观点。评估包括增量分析。
对于医生而言,预约百分比为60%的情况下成本效益最佳,50%的情况下最差。不同情况下增量分析的成本差异为15,019欧元和76,611欧元。从患者角度(n = 96)来看,预约百分比为70%的情况下成本效益最佳,50%的情况下最差。不同情况下增量分析的差异为5,248欧元和330,293欧元。
预约百分比在60%至70%之间时,之前预约的成本效益最佳。