Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Michael G. DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 23;9(3):e023578. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023578.
Timely access to care and continuity with a specific provider are important determinants of patient satisfaction when booking appointments in primary care settings. Advanced access booking systems restrict the majority of providers' appointment spots for same-day appointments and keep the number of prebooked appointments to a minimum. In the teaching clinic environment, continuity with the same provider can be a challenge. This study examines trade-offs that patients may consider during appointment bookings for six different clinical scenarios across a number of key access and continuity attributes using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) method.
Cross-sectional survey.
Two urban family medicine teaching clinics in Canada.
Convenience sample of 430 patients of family medicine clinics aged 18 and older.
Discrete choice conjoint experiment survey.
Patient preferences on six attributes: appointment booking method, appointment wait time, time spent in the waiting room, appointment time convenience, familiarity with healthcare provider and position of healthcare provider. Data were analysed by hierarchical Bayes analysis to determine estimates of part-worth utilities for each respondent.
Patients rated appointment wait time as the most highly valued attribute, followed by position of provider, then familiarity with the provider. Patients showed a significant preference (p<0.02) for their own physician for booking of routine annual check-ups and other logical preferences across attributes overall and by clinical scenario.
Patients preferred timely access to their primary care team over other attributes in the majority of health state scenarios tested, especially urgent issues, however they were willing to wait for a check-up. These results support the notion that advanced access booking systems which leave the majority of appointment spots for same day access and still leave a few for continuity (check-up) bookings, align well with trends in patient preferences.
在初级保健环境中预约时,及时获得医疗服务和与特定提供者的连续性是患者满意度的重要决定因素。高级预约预订系统限制了大多数提供者的当天预约预约点,并将预预约预约数量保持在最低水平。在教学诊所环境中,与同一提供者保持连续性可能是一个挑战。本研究使用离散选择实验(DCE)方法,检查了患者在六个不同临床情况下预约时可能会考虑的各种关键获取和连续性属性之间的权衡。
横断面调查。
加拿大两个城市的家庭医学教学诊所。
家庭医学诊所的便利样本 430 名年龄在 18 岁及以上的患者。
离散选择联合实验调查。
患者对六个属性的偏好:预约预订方式、预约等待时间、在等候室花费的时间、预约时间方便性、与医疗保健提供者的熟悉程度和医疗保健提供者的职位。通过分层贝叶斯分析对数据进行分析,以确定每个受访者的部分价值效用的估计值。
患者将预约等待时间评为最有价值的属性,其次是提供者的职位,然后是对提供者的熟悉程度。患者在预定常规年度检查和其他逻辑属性方面表现出明显的偏好(p<0.02),并且在大多数健康状况场景中都表现出对自己医生的偏好。
在测试的大多数健康状态场景中,患者优先考虑及时获得初级保健团队的服务,而不是其他属性,尤其是紧急问题,但他们愿意等待检查。这些结果支持这样一种观点,即高级预约预订系统将大部分预约点留给当天的访问,并且仍然为连续性(检查)预订留出一些预约点,这与患者偏好的趋势非常吻合。