Suppr超能文献

一种新的乳腺细胞学报告表格。

A new reporting form for breast cytology.

作者信息

Tsuchiya Shin-ichi, Akiyama Futoshi, Moriya Takuya, Tsuda Hitoshi, Umemura Shinobu, Katayama Yousei, Ishihara Akinori, Inai Yasuteru, Itoh Hitoshi, Kitamura Takashi

机构信息

Cytology and Core Needle Biopsy Subcommittee of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Breast Cancer. 2009;16(3):202-6. doi: 10.1007/s12282-009-0128-6. Epub 2009 May 30.

Abstract

The Cytology and Core Needle Biopsy Subcommittee, organized under the Rules Committee of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society, has prepared a new form for breast cytology reports. This reporting form consists of "diagnostic categories" and "recommendations." The "diagnostic category" is either "specimen inadequacy" or "specimen adequacy." The judgment on "specimen adequacy" is subdivided into four categories: "normal or benign," "indeterminate," "suspicious for malignancy," and "malignant." The "recommendation" indicates descriptions of cytological features and estimated histological type of tumor (these descriptions should be as detailed as possible). On the basis of an analysis of cytological data from 3,439 cases performed before preparing this form, the subcommittee has attached the following recommended goals to this form: (1) the percentage of "specimen inadequacy" should be 10% or less of all samples, (2) the percentage of "indeterminate" samples should be 10% or less of all "specimen adequacy" cases, and (3) 90% or more of "suspicious for malignancy" cases should be diagnosed as "malignant" in a subsequent histological examination. We hope that modification of this form, if it requires revision in the future, will be evidence-based, as was the process for compiling this set of rules.

摘要

在日本乳腺癌学会规则委员会组织下成立的细胞学与粗针活检小组委员会,制定了一种新的乳腺细胞学报告表格。该报告表格由“诊断类别”和“建议”两部分组成。“诊断类别”分为“标本不合格”或“标本合格”。对“标本合格”的判断又细分为四类:“正常或良性”、“不确定”、“怀疑恶性”和“恶性”。“建议”部分列出了细胞学特征描述以及肿瘤的估计组织学类型(这些描述应尽可能详细)。基于在制定此表格之前对3439例病例的细胞学数据进行的分析,小组委员会为该表格设定了以下建议目标:(1)“标本不合格”的比例应占所有样本的10%或更低;(2)“不确定”样本的比例应占所有“标本合格”病例的10%或更低;(3)90%或更多的“怀疑恶性”病例在后续组织学检查中应被诊断为“恶性”。我们希望,如果将来需要对该表格进行修订,修订将以证据为基础,就如同编制这套规则的过程一样。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验