Suppr超能文献

测量肿瘤学家与晚期癌症患者之间的治疗联盟:人际联系量表。

Measuring therapeutic alliance between oncologists and patients with advanced cancer: the Human Connection Scale.

作者信息

Mack Jennifer W, Block Susan D, Nilsson Matthew, Wright Alexi, Trice Elizabeth, Friedlander Robert, Paulk Elizabeth, Prigerson Holly G

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2009 Jul 15;115(14):3302-11. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24360.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients consider their human connection with a physician an important aspect of end-of-life (EOL) care. In this study, the authors sought to develop and validate a measure of therapeutic alliance between patients with advanced cancer and their physicians and to evaluate the effects of therapeutic alliance on EOL experiences and care.

METHODS

The Human Connection (THC) scale was developed to measure the extent to which patients felt a sense of mutual understanding, caring, and trust with their physicians. The scale was administered to 217 patients with advanced cancer along with measures of attributes that have been related hypothetically to therapeutic alliance, including emotional acceptance of terminal illness. EOL outcomes in 90 patients who died during the study also were examined.

RESULTS

The 16-item THC questionnaire was consistent internally (Cronbach alpha = .90) and valid based on its expected positive association with emotional acceptance of terminal illness (r = .31; P < .0001). THC scores were related inversely to symptom burden (r = -.19; P = .006), functional status (Karnofsky performance status; r = .22; P = .001), and mental illness (THC score: 50.69 for patients with any Diagnostic and Statistical Manual [DSM] diagnosis vs 55.22 for patients with no DSM diagnosis; P = .03). THC scores were not associated significantly with EOL discussions (P = .68). Among the patients who died, EOL intensive care unit (ICU) care was associated inversely with therapeutic alliance (THC score: 46.5 for patients who received ICU care vs 55.5 for patients without ICU care; P = .002), so that patients with higher THC scores were less likely to spend time in the ICU during the last week of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The THC scale is a valid and reliable measure of therapeutic alliance between patients with advanced cancer and their physicians. In addition, there was no evidence to suggest that EOL discussions harm patients' therapeutic alliance. A strong therapeutic alliance was associated with emotional acceptance of a terminal illness and with decreased ICU care at the EOL among patients with advanced cancer.

摘要

背景

患者认为他们与医生之间的人际联系是临终关怀的一个重要方面。在本研究中,作者试图开发并验证一种衡量晚期癌症患者与其医生之间治疗联盟的方法,并评估治疗联盟对临终体验和护理的影响。

方法

开发了人际联系(THC)量表,以衡量患者对与医生之间相互理解、关怀和信任的感受程度。该量表应用于217名晚期癌症患者,并同时测量了假设与治疗联盟相关的属性,包括对绝症的情感接受度。还对研究期间死亡的90名患者的临终结局进行了检查。

结果

16项THC问卷在内部是一致的(克朗巴赫α系数 = 0.90),并且基于其与对绝症的情感接受度的预期正相关而有效(r = 0.31;P < 0.0001)。THC得分与症状负担呈负相关(r = -0.19;P = 0.006),与功能状态(卡诺夫斯基功能状态评分;r = 0.22;P = 0.001)以及精神疾病呈负相关(THC得分:有任何《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)诊断的患者为50.69,无DSM诊断的患者为55.22;P = 0.03)。THC得分与临终讨论无显著关联(P = 0.68)。在死亡的患者中,临终重症监护病房(ICU)护理与治疗联盟呈负相关(THC得分:接受ICU护理的患者为46.5,未接受ICU护理的患者为55.5;P = 0.002),因此THC得分较高的患者在生命最后一周在ICU度过的时间较少。

结论

THC量表是衡量晚期癌症患者与其医生之间治疗联盟的有效且可靠的方法。此外,没有证据表明临终讨论会损害患者的治疗联盟。强大的治疗联盟与对绝症的情感接受度以及晚期癌症患者临终时减少的ICU护理相关。

相似文献

3
A scale to assess religious beliefs in end-of-life medical care.
Cancer. 2019 May 1;125(9):1527-1535. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31946. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
5
Actual and Missed Opportunities for End-of-Life Care Discussions With Oncology Patients: A Qualitative Study.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113193. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13193.
6
Emotional numbness modifies the effect of end-of-life discussions on end-of-life care.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 May;45(5):841-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
8
End-of-life care discussions among patients with advanced cancer: a cohort study.
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Feb 7;156(3):204-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-3-201202070-00008.
9
Therapeutic Alliance between the Caregivers of Critical Illness Survivors and Intensive Care Unit Clinicians.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Nov;12(11):1646-53. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201507-408OC.
10
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.

引用本文的文献

2
Measuring the quality of patient-provider relationships in serious illness: A scoping review.
Palliat Med. 2025 Mar;39(3):332-345. doi: 10.1177/02692163251315304. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
3
Obliged to fight? Patient moral processes in the face of poor prognosis cancer.
Health Psychol. 2025 Jun;44(6):587-596. doi: 10.1037/hea0001438. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
4
Cancer patients' sense of coherence - psycho-oncological consultations and therapeutic alliance as salutogenic factors.
Health Psychol Rep. 2024 Oct 7;12(4):322-336. doi: 10.5114/hpr/189462. eCollection 2024.
6
7
Feasibility of a Serious Illness Communication Program for Pediatric Advance Care Planning.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2424626. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24626.
8
Associations of Health Care Utilization and Therapeutic Alliance in Patients with Advanced Cancer.
J Palliat Med. 2024 Apr;27(4):515-520. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0559.

本文引用的文献

1
Adjusting Performance Measures to Ensure Equitable Plan Comparisons.
Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Spring;22(3):109-126.
5
Efficacy of communication skills training for giving bad news and discussing transitions to palliative care.
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 12;167(5):453-60. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.5.453.
6
Creating enduring change: demonstrating the long-term impact of a faculty development program in palliative care.
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Sep;21(9):907-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00486.x.
7
You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE.
Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92-100. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6.
9
Beyond advance directives: importance of communication skills at the end of life.
JAMA. 2005 Jul 20;294(3):359-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.3.359.
10
Approaching difficult communication tasks in oncology.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2005 May-Jun;55(3):164-77. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.3.164.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验