Garre-Olmo Josep, Planas-Pujol Xènia, López-Pousa Secundino, Juvinya Dolors, Vilà Antoni, Vilalta-Franch Joan
Research Unit, Institut d'Assistència Sanitària, Sanitària, Spain.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 May;57(5):815-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02221.x.
To assess the prevalence of suspected elder abuse subtypes and to identify related factors.
Cross-sectional, population-based, descriptive study.
Eight rural villages in Girona, Spain.
Six hundred seventy-six inhabitants aged 75 and older.
All participants were interviewed in their homes using the study protocol, which includes an abuse screen used in previous elder abuse studies and questions about demographic, social, physical, psychiatric, cognitive, and social services variables.
The mean age of the participants was 81.7 +/- 4.8; 58.2% were female. Prevalence of suspected neglect abuse was 16.0% (95% confidence interval (CI)=13.2-18.9), prevalence of psychosocial abuse was 15.2% (95% CI=12.8-18.2), prevalence of financial abuse was 4.7% (95% CI=3.0-6.4) and prevalence of physical abuse was 0.1% (95% CI=0.004-0.8). Psychosocial abuse was positively associated with depressive symptoms (odds ratio (OR)=1.65, 95% CI=1.01-2.72), social isolation (OR=0.35, 95% CI=0.18-0.69), and frequent bladder incontinence (OR=2.44, 95% CI=1.23-4.86). Neglect abuse was positively associated with social isolation (OR=0.52, 95% CI=0.27-0.99), use of social services (OR=1.83, 95% CI=1.05-3.20), and living arrangements (OR=5.29, 95% CI=2.65-10.56). Financial abuse was associated with marital status (OR=0.15, 95% CI=0.04-0.59), age 85 and older, (OR=3.84, 95% CI=1.70-8.68), and Mini-Mental State Examination score (OR=0.85, 95% CI=0.78-0.94).
After adjustment for confounding factors, each subtype of suspected elder abuse was associated with different variables. The results of this study suggest that elder abuse cannot be analyzed as a unitary concept and that risk factors must be assessed for each abuse subtype.
评估疑似虐待老年人亚型的患病率并确定相关因素。
基于人群的横断面描述性研究。
西班牙赫罗纳的八个乡村。
676名75岁及以上的居民。
所有参与者均在家中接受使用研究方案进行的访谈,该方案包括先前虐待老年人研究中使用的虐待筛查以及有关人口统计学、社会、身体、精神、认知和社会服务变量的问题。
参与者的平均年龄为81.7±4.8岁;58.2%为女性。疑似疏忽虐待的患病率为16.0%(95%置信区间(CI)=13.2 - 18.9),心理社会虐待的患病率为15.2%(95%CI = 12.8 - 18.2),经济虐待的患病率为4.7%(95%CI = 3.0 - 6.4),身体虐待的患病率为0.1%(95%CI = 0.004 - 0.8)。心理社会虐待与抑郁症状呈正相关(优势比(OR)=1.65,95%CI = 1.01 - 2.72)、社会隔离(OR = 0.35,95%CI = 0.18 - 0.69)以及频繁膀胱失禁(OR = 2.44,95%CI = 1.23 - 4.86)。疏忽虐待与社会隔离(OR = 0.52,95%CI = 0.27 - 0.99)、使用社会服务(OR = 1.83,95%CI = 1.05 - 3.20)以及居住安排(OR = 5.29,95%CI = 2.65 - 10.56)呈正相关。经济虐待与婚姻状况(OR = 0.15,95%CI = 0.04 - 0.59)、85岁及以上年龄(OR = 3.84,95%CI = 1.70 - 8.68)以及简易精神状态检查表得分(OR = 0.85,95%CI = 0.78 - 0.94)相关。
在对混杂因素进行调整后,每种疑似虐待老年人的亚型都与不同变量相关。本研究结果表明,虐待老年人不能作为一个单一概念进行分析,必须针对每种虐待亚型评估风险因素。