• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一组学龄儿童的连续与脉冲纯音听力测定法

Continuous versus pulsed pure-tone audiometry in a group of school-aged children.

作者信息

van Dijk Catherine, Osman Naeema

机构信息

Department of Communication Pathology, University of Pretoria, South Africa.

出版信息

S Afr J Commun Disord. 2008;55:29-36.

PMID:19485067
Abstract

Pure-tone testing is the primary audiological test procedure for the differential diagnosis of hearing loss and hearing disorders in school-aged children. No research is currently available internationally for children's responses to continuous versus pulsed pure-tones. The aim of this exploratory investigation was to compare the performance of a group of school-aged children on continuous versus pulsed pure-tone audiometry. The aims were to determine whether a threshold difference existed between continuous versus pulsed pure-tones and to record whether a listener preference existed between continuous versus pulsed tones for the frequency range of 125 to 8000 Hz. Eighteen children (36 ears) aged between 8-12 years, participated in a hearing evaluation as well as in a brief three-question interview. Descriptive statistics viz. average threshold, mean difference and standard deviation of thresholds were used to analyse data. Listeners' perceived preferences were calculated in percentages and reasons for preferring one signal over another was analysed qualitatively. Although the automatically pulsed tone threshold (averaged across the frequencies tested) was lower than for the continuous tone, the difference was only 0.2 dB in the left ear and 0.5dB in the right ear. This small difference is not important in clinical applications for which 5 dB increments are used in pure-tone audiometry. Where a listener preference was indicated, however, the continuous tones were preferred over pulsed tones by 56% percent of subjects. These findings differ from similar studies involving adults. This revealed that children may yield different preferences during pure-tone testing than adults and that these preferences should be taken into consideration during testing.

摘要

纯音测试是学龄儿童听力损失和听力障碍鉴别诊断的主要听力学测试方法。目前国际上尚无关于儿童对连续纯音与脉冲纯音反应的研究。这项探索性调查的目的是比较一组学龄儿童在连续纯音听力测定和脉冲纯音听力测定中的表现。目的是确定连续纯音与脉冲纯音之间是否存在阈值差异,并记录在125至8000赫兹频率范围内,听众对连续纯音与脉冲纯音是否存在偏好。18名年龄在8至12岁之间的儿童(36只耳朵)参与了听力评估以及简短的三问题访谈。使用描述性统计数据,即平均阈值、阈值的平均差异和标准差来分析数据。听众的感知偏好以百分比计算,并对偏好一种信号而非另一种信号的原因进行定性分析。尽管自动脉冲音阈值(在测试频率范围内平均)低于连续音,但左耳的差异仅为0.2分贝,右耳为0.5分贝。在纯音听力测定中使用5分贝增量的临床应用中,这种小差异并不重要。然而,在表明有听众偏好的情况下,56%的受试者更喜欢连续音而非脉冲音。这些发现与涉及成年人的类似研究不同。这表明儿童在纯音测试中可能比成年人有不同的偏好,并且在测试过程中应考虑这些偏好。

相似文献

1
Continuous versus pulsed pure-tone audiometry in a group of school-aged children.一组学龄儿童的连续与脉冲纯音听力测定法
S Afr J Commun Disord. 2008;55:29-36.
2
Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.使用新生儿听力筛查转介婴儿的 click 听觉脑干反应预测听力损失程度。
Ear Hear. 2013 May-Jun;34(3):361-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182728b88.
3
Continuous versus pulsed tones in audiometry.听力测定中的连续音与脉冲音
Am J Audiol. 2004 Jun;13(1):54-61. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2004/008).
4
High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.儿童高频纯音测听:与耳毒性标准相关的测试-重测信度研究。
Ear Hear. 2012 Jan-Feb;33(1):104-11. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318228a77d.
5
Otitis media with effusion in children: Cross-frequency correlation in pure tone audiometry.儿童分泌性中耳炎:纯音听阈测试中的跨频相关。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 22;14(8):e0221405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221405. eCollection 2019.
6
Comparing pure-tone audiometry and auditory steady state response for the measurement of hearing loss.比较纯音听力测定法和听觉稳态反应在听力损失测量中的应用。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Jun;136(6):966-71. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.12.008.
7
Comparing pure-, pulsed, and warbled tone thresholds in adults at 3000 and 6000 Hz.
Am J Audiol. 2011 Jun;20(1):42-7. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0026). Epub 2011 Apr 7.
8
Validation of multi-channel auditory steady-state response in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.感音神经性听力损失成人多通道听觉稳态反应的验证
J Laryngol Otol. 2009 Jan;123(1):38-44. doi: 10.1017/S0022215108002351. Epub 2008 May 1.
9
A comparison of screening methods in school-aged children.学龄儿童筛查方法的比较
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Dec;127(6):516-9. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2002.129734.
10
Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.仅使用空气传导测试来识别传导性听力损失:自动测试组合的可靠性和有效性。
Ear Hear. 2014 Jan-Feb;35(1):e1-8. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829e058f.