• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Twenty-four hour hospitalization after cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Saltzstein E C, Mercer L C, Peacock J B, Dougherty S H

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University School of Medicine, El Paso 79905.

出版信息

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991 Nov;173(5):367-70.

PMID:1948586
Abstract

To evaluate the likelihood that patients can be discharged from the hospital the day after open cholecystectomy, a prospective study of 500 consecutive patients undergoing cholecystectomy was undertaken. The study group included patients with associated acute and gangrenous cholecystitis, biliary pancreatitis and choledocholithiasis as well as those with diabetes, hypertension and obesity. Approximately one-fourth of the total group were discharged within 24 hours and over one-half in 48 hours. There was a significant correlation between advancing age and increasing length of stay. Almost one-half of the patients less than 35 years of age without acute or complicated disease were discharged within 24 hours, more than 80 per cent within 48 hours, and the mean length of postoperative stay (MLS) for these patients was 1.9 days. The presence of choledocholithiasis and fever greater than 101 degrees F. increased MLS, while acute cholecystitis, hyperamylasemia and leukocytosis did not. Early discharge from the hospital after open cholecystectomy, even in sick patients, is safe and cost-effective.

摘要

相似文献

1
Twenty-four hour hospitalization after cholecystectomy.
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991 Nov;173(5):367-70.
2
Palliative percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage of gallbladder empyema before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.在腹腔镜胆囊切除术之前对胆囊积脓进行姑息性经皮经肝胆囊引流术。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2000 Jul-Aug;47(34):932-6.
3
Cholecystitis in the octogenarian: is laparoscopic cholecystectomy the best approach?老年胆囊炎:腹腔镜胆囊切除术是最佳治疗方法吗?
Am Surg. 2001 Jul;67(7):637-40.
4
Early scheduled laparoscopic cholecystectomy following percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for patients with acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎患者经皮经肝胆囊引流术后早期计划性腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Surg Endosc. 2002 Dec;16(12):1704-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9004-6. Epub 2002 Sep 6.
5
[Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is as effective as hospitalization and from a social perspective less expensive: a randomized study].[门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术与住院手术同样有效,且从社会角度来看成本更低:一项随机研究]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Dec 15;145(50):2434-9.
6
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Prospective non-randomized study].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎。前瞻性非随机研究]
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2000 Apr;24(4):400-3.
7
Acute cholecystitis--room for improvement?急性胆囊炎——还有改进的空间吗?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Jan;84(1):10-3.
8
Outpatient open cholecystectomy.
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Mar;174(3):173-5.
9
Safety, efficacy, cost, and morbidity of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 228 consecutive patients.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术的安全性、有效性、成本及发病率:对228例连续患者的前瞻性分析
Am Surg. 1993 Jan;59(1):23-7.
10
[Surgical treatment in acute cholecystitis emergencies].[急性胆囊炎急诊的外科治疗]
Chir Ital. 2001 May-Jun;53(3):375-81.

引用本文的文献

1
Criteria and benchmarks for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a free-standing ambulatory center.独立门诊中心腹腔镜胆囊切除术的标准和基准
JSLS. 1999 Oct-Dec;3(4):315-8.
2
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: day-care versus clinical observation.腹腔镜胆囊切除术:日间手术与临床观察
Ann Surg. 1998 Dec;228(6):734-40. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199812000-00003.
3
Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术相关的死亡率和并发症。一项荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 1996 Nov;224(5):609-20. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199611000-00005.
4
Is outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy wise?门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术明智吗?
Surg Endosc. 1995 Dec;9(12):1263-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00190156.