Chair of Animal Hygiene, Technische Universität München, Weihenstephaner Berg, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.
Zoonoses Public Health. 2010 May;57(3):171-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x.
By investigating the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance characteristics of Gram-positive bacteria from organic and conventional keeping systems of laying hens, it was to be determined to what extent these properties are influenced by the different systems. For this purpose, a total of 799 cloacal swabs and 800 egg samples were examined. Prevalences for all selected bacteria from cloacal swabs were much the same for both organic and caged birds: Listeria spp.1.3%[org] versus 1.6%[con]; Enterococcus spp. 95.5%[org] versus 97.5%[con]. Egg contents and eggshells were generally contaminated to a lesser extent, primarily with Enterococcus spp. Listeria isolates were susceptible to almost all tested antibiotics, only three Listeria innocua from conventional keepings were resistant to clindamycin; one isolate additionally to imipenem. High percentages of Enterococcus faecalis were resistant to doxycycline and macrolides. Enterococcus faecium proved to have high resistance rates to clindamycin, fosfomycin and erythromycin; 9.1% were even resistant to the reserve antibiotic synercid. Further, Enterococcus spp. showed higher resistance rates to doxycycline, erythromycin, fosfomycin and rifampicin. No glycopeptide resistant enterococci were detected. A correlation between keeping system and resistance/susceptibility rates could be demonstrated. In detail, E. faecalis from organic laying hen husbandries showed significant lower resistance prevalences to tylosin, streptomycin and doxycycline; susceptibility rates were higher for enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Rifampicin and imipenem were more effective in isolates from conventional keepings (P < 0.05). The amounts of resistant isolates of the Enterococcus raffinosus from organic farms were significantly lower, the amounts of sensitive isolates were significantly higher than from conventional farms concerning eight antibiotics (P < 0.05). When comparing the susceptibility/resistance rates, as well as the mean minimum inhibitory concentrations values, the consistent tendency is that bacteria from organic layer flocks are more susceptible to antimicrobials. These results show that organic livestock farming plays a part in contributing to reduced antibiotic resistance.
通过调查来自有机和常规蛋鸡饲养系统的革兰氏阳性菌的流行和抗菌药物耐药性特征,确定这些特性在多大程度上受到不同系统的影响。为此,共检查了 799 份直肠拭子和 800 份鸡蛋样本。两种饲养系统的鸡只直肠拭子中所有选定细菌的流行率都非常相似:李斯特菌属 1.3%[有机]与 1.6%[常规];肠球菌属 95.5%[有机]与 97.5%[常规]。鸡蛋内容物和蛋壳的污染程度通常较低,主要是肠球菌属。李斯特菌分离株对几乎所有测试的抗生素都敏感,只有来自常规饲养的三株无害李斯特菌对克林霉素耐药;一株分离株对亚胺培南也耐药。高百分比的屎肠球菌对强力霉素和大环内酯类耐药。粪肠球菌对克林霉素、磷霉素和红霉素的耐药率较高;甚至有 9.1%对备用抗生素协同霉素耐药。此外,肠球菌属对强力霉素、红霉素、磷霉素和利福平的耐药率较高。未检测到耐糖肽肠球菌。可以证明饲养系统与耐药/敏感性率之间存在相关性。具体而言,来自有机蛋鸡养殖场的屎肠球菌对泰乐菌素、链霉素和强力霉素的耐药率明显较低;恩诺沙星和环丙沙星的敏感性更高。利福平和亚胺培南对常规养殖场(P < 0.05)的分离株更有效。来自有机农场的赖氏肠球菌的耐药分离株数量明显较低,敏感分离株数量明显高于常规农场的八种抗生素(P < 0.05)。当比较药敏/耐药率以及平均最小抑菌浓度值时,一致的趋势是来自有机层鸡群的细菌对抗生素更敏感。这些结果表明,有机畜牧业在降低抗生素耐药性方面发挥了作用。