Randomized trials in surgery.
作者信息
Gelijns Annetine C, Ascheim Deborah D, Parides Michael K, Kent K Craig, Moskowitz Alan J
机构信息
Department of Health Policy, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA.
出版信息
Surgery. 2009 Jun;145(6):581-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.04.003.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Randomized trials in surgery.外科领域的随机试验。
Surgery. 2009 Jun;145(6):581-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.04.003.
2
Placebo surgery in trials of therapy for Parkinson's disease.帕金森病治疗试验中的安慰剂手术。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Feb 3;342(5):353; author reply 354-5.
3
The importance of determining quality of life in clinical trials.在临床试验中确定生活质量的重要性。
Surgery. 2009 Jun;145(6):622-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.11.012. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
4
Ethics of surgical innovation.外科创新的伦理问题。
Br J Surg. 2001 Jul;88(7):897-8. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01769.x.
5
Randomized controlled trials for evaluating surgical questions.用于评估外科问题的随机对照试验。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Jun;128(6):631-4. doi: 10.1001/archotol.128.6.631.
6
IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage.手术创新的 IDEAL 框架 3：评估阶段的随机对照试验和长期研究阶段的评估。
BMJ. 2013 Jun 18;346:f2820. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2820.
7
Surgical randomized-controlled trials and CONSORT 2010.外科随机对照试验与CONSORT 2010
Ann Surg. 2011 Mar;253(3):633-4; author reply 634-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820dcd4a.
8
CONSORT compliance in surgical randomized trials: possible solutions.
Ann Surg. 2015 May;261(5):e135. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000409.
9
Randomized controlled clinical trials-support but not substitute of decision-making in surgery.随机对照临床试验有助于手术决策，但不能替代手术决策。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2006 Aug;391(4):301-3. doi: 10.1007/s00423-006-0062-4. Epub 2006 Jun 8.
10
Placebo surgery in trials of therapy for Parkinson's disease.帕金森病治疗试验中的安慰剂手术
N Engl J Med. 2000 Feb 3;342(5):354-5.
引用本文的文献
1
Global collaborative research in metabolic and bariatric surgery (GCRMBS): current status and directions for the future.代谢与减重外科学全球协作研究（GCRMBS）：现状与未来方向。
BMC Surg. 2024 Nov 20;24(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02636-4.
2
Randomised clinical trials in surgery: are we at a crossroads?外科领域的随机临床试验：我们正处在十字路口吗？
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Nov 7;86(1):3-6. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001457. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Availability of evidence and comparative effectiveness for surgical versus drug interventions: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.手术干预与药物干预的有效性和比较效果的证据：系统评价和荟萃分析概述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 9;14(1):e076675. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076675.
4
Is it feasible and ethical to randomize patients between surgery and non-surgical treatments for gastrointestinal cancers?将胃肠道癌症患者随机分配至手术治疗和非手术治疗之间，这可行且符合伦理道德吗？
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 16;13:1119436. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1119436. eCollection 2023.
5
Availability of evidence and comparative effectiveness for surgical versus drug interventions: an overview of systematic reviews.手术干预与药物干预的证据可及性及比较效果：系统评价概述
medRxiv. 2023 Feb 1:2023.01.30.23285207. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.30.23285207.
6
Paediatric surgical trials, their fragility index, and why to avoid using it to evaluate results.儿科外科试验、脆弱指数及其为何应避免用于评估结果
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Jul;38(7):1057-1066. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05133-y. Epub 2022 May 7.
7
Surgical treatment of GERD: systematic review and meta-analysis.胃食管反流病的手术治疗：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4095-4123. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08358-5. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
8
Meta-analyses in paediatric surgery are often fragile: implications and consequences.儿科外科学中的荟萃分析往往很脆弱：影响和后果。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2021 Mar;37(3):363-367. doi: 10.1007/s00383-020-04827-5. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
9
Maintaining the blind in sham controlled interventional trials: lessons from the EPISOD study.在假手术对照的干预性试验中对盲人受试者的维持：来自EPISOD研究的经验教训。
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Nov;7(11):E1322-E1326. doi: 10.1055/a-0900-3789. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
10
A systematic breakdown of the levels of evidence supporting the European Society of Cardiology guidelines.对支持欧洲心脏病学会指南的证据水平进行系统分析。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019 Dec;26(18):1944-1952. doi: 10.1177/2047487319868540. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
本文引用的文献
1
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗严重冠状动脉疾病的比较
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 5;360(10):961-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804626. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
2
Coronary revascularization in context.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 5;360(10):1024-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0900452. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
3
Progress versus precision: challenges in clinical trial design for left ventricular assist devices.进展与精准度：左心室辅助装置临床试验设计中的挑战
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Sep;82(3):1140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.123.
4
Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation.冠状动脉旁路移植术与支架植入术的长期疗效
N Engl J Med. 2005 May 26;352(21):2174-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040316.
5
Left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy: a new look at survival.作为终末期治疗的左心室辅助装置：对生存率的新审视。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Jan;129(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.04.044.
6
Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy.实用临床试验：提高临床研究在临床和卫生政策决策中的价值。
JAMA. 2003 Sep 24;290(12):1624-32. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.12.1624.
7
Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure.终末期心力衰竭患者长期使用左心室辅助装置。
N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 15;345(20):1435-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012175.
8
The fall and rise of carotid endarterectomy in the United States and Canada.美国和加拿大颈动脉内膜切除术的兴衰
N Engl J Med. 1998 Nov 12;339(20):1441-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199811123392006.
9
Surgical research or comic opera: questions, but few answers.外科研究还是喜剧歌剧：问题不少，但答案寥寥。
Lancet. 1996 Apr 13;347(9007):984-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90137-3.
10
The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Southern Surgeons Club.腹腔镜胆囊切除术的学习曲线。南方外科医生俱乐部。
Am J Surg. 1995 Jul;170(1):55-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80252-9.
Zotero 插件