Bueti Domenica, Walsh Vincent
Neuroimaging Laboratory, Santa Lucia Foundation, Via Ardeatina 306, Rome, Italy.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 12;364(1525):1831-40. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0028.
The development of sub-disciplines within cognitive neuroscience follows common sense categories such as language, audition, action, memory, emotion and perception among others. There are also well-established research programmes into temporal perception, spatial perception and mathematical cognition that also reflect the subjective impression of how experience is constructed. There is of course no reason why the brain should respect these common sense, text book divisions and, here, we discuss the contention that generalized magnitude processing is a more accurate conceptual description of how the brain deals with information about time, space, number and other dimensions. The roots of the case for linking magnitudes are based on the use to which magnitude information is put (action), the way in which we learn about magnitudes (ontogeny), shared properties and locations of magnitude processing neurons, the effects of brain lesions and behavioural interference studies. Here, we assess this idea in the context of a theory of magnitude, which proposed common processing mechanisms of time, space, number and other dimensions.
认知神经科学内部子学科的发展遵循语言、听觉、行动、记忆、情感和感知等常识性类别。对于时间感知、空间感知和数学认知也有成熟的研究项目,这些也反映了经验构建方式的主观印象。当然,大脑没有理由遵循这些常识性的教科书划分,在此,我们讨论这样一种观点,即广义量值加工是对大脑如何处理时间、空间、数字和其他维度信息的更准确概念描述。将量值联系起来的依据源于量值信息的用途(行动)、我们了解量值的方式(个体发育)、量值加工神经元的共同特性和位置、脑损伤的影响以及行为干扰研究。在此,我们在量值理论的背景下评估这一观点,该理论提出了时间、空间、数字和其他维度的共同加工机制。