Jarrett Christopher A, Ranawat Amar S, Bruzzone Matteo, Blum Yossef C, Rodriguez Jose A, Ranawat Chitranjan S
Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jun;91(6):1344-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00970.
Early reports on modern ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacements have demonstrated excellent clinical and radiographic results with few cases of catastrophic failure, which, in the case of earlier designs, often had been caused by implant fracture. Several reports, however, have noted the presence of audible squeaking. The purpose of the present study was to determine the incidence of squeaking in association with the use of this bearing couple.
During the period from March 2003 to May 2005, three surgeons performed 159 total hip arthroplasties in 143 patients with use of a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing. One hundred and forty-nine hips (131 patients) were available for review after at least one year of follow-up. These patients were followed prospectively with use of the modified Hospital for Special Surgery hip score and a patient-administered questionnaire. Additionally, a control group of sixty hips (forty-eight patients) with a metal-on-polyethylene bearing was matched to the ceramic group on the basis of age, sex, and body mass index to compare the incidence of squeaking and other noises. Radiographic evaluations were performed according to previously established criteria.
Fourteen (10.7%) of 131 patients described an audible squeak during normal activities. However, squeaking was reproducible clinically in only four patients, and only one patient complained of squeaking before being presented with the questionnaire. The average Hospital for Special Surgery score improved from 19.8 preoperatively to 38.4 at the time of the latest follow-up, indicating excellent clinical results. Ninety-five percent of the patients had a satisfaction score of > or =8 of 10. Three hips dislocated. One of those three hips squeaked and was revised because of recurrent dislocations. One patient was considering revision because of squeaking. In the matched metal-on-polyethylene cohort, there were no cases of squeaking.
The squeaking hip is a phenomenon that is unique to total hip replacements with hard-on-hard bearings. The incidence of squeaking in association with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings may be higher than previously reported as <1% of the patients in the present study reported this finding before being queried. The causes and implications of squeaking are yet to be determined. The use of hard-on-hard bearings offers many advantages in terms of wear reduction, especially for young and active patients. Nonetheless, patients considering ceramic-on-ceramic bearings should be counseled with regard to this phenomenon.
早期关于现代陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术的报告显示,临床和影像学结果优异,灾难性失败病例极少,而在早期设计中,灾难性失败通常是由植入物骨折引起的。然而,有几份报告指出存在可听见的摩擦声。本研究的目的是确定使用这种关节配对时摩擦声的发生率。
在2003年3月至2005年5月期间,三位外科医生为143例患者实施了159例使用陶瓷对陶瓷关节的全髋关节置换术。在至少随访一年后,有149髋(131例患者)可供评估。使用改良的特种外科医院髋关节评分和患者自行填写的问卷对这些患者进行前瞻性随访。此外,根据年龄、性别和体重指数,将60髋(48例患者)的金属对聚乙烯关节对照组与陶瓷组进行匹配,以比较摩擦声及其他噪音的发生率。根据先前制定的标准进行影像学评估。
131例患者中有14例(10.7%)称在正常活动时有可听见的摩擦声。然而,临床上只有4例患者的摩擦声可重现,且只有1例患者在收到问卷之前就抱怨有摩擦声。特种外科医院评分的平均值从术前的19.8提高到最近一次随访时的38.4,表明临床结果优异。95%的患者满意度评分在10分制中≥8分。有3髋发生脱位。这3髋中有1髋有摩擦声,因反复脱位而进行了翻修。1例患者因摩擦声而考虑进行翻修。在匹配的金属对聚乙烯队列中,没有摩擦声病例。
髋关节摩擦声是硬对硬关节全髋关节置换术特有的现象。与陶瓷对陶瓷关节相关的摩擦声发生率可能高于先前报道,因为在本研究中,<1%的患者在被询问之前就报告了这一发现。摩擦声的原因及影响尚待确定。硬对硬关节在减少磨损方面有许多优点,尤其是对于年轻且活跃的患者。尽管如此,对于考虑使用陶瓷对陶瓷关节的患者,应就这一现象提供咨询。