• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Third and fourth generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years.第三代和第四代陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术至少随访十年。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Jul 6;31:101942. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101942. eCollection 2022 Aug.
2
Do the Reasons for Ceramic-on-ceramic Revisions Differ From Other Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty?全髋关节置换术中陶瓷对陶瓷关节翻修的原因与其他假体有差异吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2190-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4917-x.
3
Ceramic-on-Ceramic in Total Hip Replacement Revision.全髋关节置换翻修术中的陶瓷对陶瓷
Z Orthop Unfall. 2018 Jun;156(3):272-280. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-124767. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
4
Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty is superior to metal-on-conventional polyethylene at 20-year follow-up: A randomised clinical trial.陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术优于金属对传统聚乙烯在 20 年随访:一项随机临床试验。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Feb;107(1):102744. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102744. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
5
Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.全髋关节置换术中不同轴承的结果——植入物存活率、翻修原因及患者报告的结果。
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
6
Do alumina matrix composite bearings decrease hip noises and bearing fractures at a minimum of 5 years after THA?氧化铝基复合材料轴承能否在全髋关节置换术后至少5年内减少髋关节异响和轴承断裂的发生?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3796-802. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4428-1.
7
The reasons for ceramic-on-ceramic revisions between the third- and fourth-generation bearings in total hip arthroplasty from multicentric registry data.从多中心注册数据看三代和四代全髋关节陶瓷-陶瓷翻修的原因。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 10;11(1):5539. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85193-7.
8
Could larger diameter of 4th generation ceramic bearing increase the rate of squeaking after THA?: A retrospective study.第四代陶瓷轴承更大的直径会增加全髋关节置换术后的摩擦音发生率吗?一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(52):e13977. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013977.
9
Cementless ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty in post-traumatic osteoarthritis after acetabular fracture: long-term results.髋臼骨折后创伤性骨关节炎中无骨水泥陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术:长期结果
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Apr;141(4):683-691. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03711-0. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
10
Higher risk of 2-year cup revision of ceramic-on-ceramic versus ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing: analysis of 33,454 primary press-fit total hip arthroplasties registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI).陶瓷对陶瓷与陶瓷对聚乙烯轴承相比,2 年翻修杯的风险更高:荷兰关节置换注册处(LROI)登记的 33454 例初次压配全髋关节置换术的分析。
Hip Int. 2023 Mar;33(2):280-287. doi: 10.1177/11207000211064975. Epub 2022 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Fourth-generation Ceramic Head Fracture in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report and Literature Review.全髋关节置换术中第四代陶瓷头骨折:一例病例报告及文献综述
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Feb 11;32:101614. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101614. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Age, activity, and native femoral offset are associated with articular noise in ceramic on ceramic total hip arthroplasty (THA) with custom stems.年龄、活动度和股骨偏心距与定制柄陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术后关节噪声有关。
Int Orthop. 2024 Dec;48(12):3091-3099. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06299-x. Epub 2024 Sep 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing fractures in total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of data from the National Joint Registry.全髋关节置换术中陶瓷对陶瓷轴承骨折:来自国家关节注册中心的数据分析
Bone Joint J. 2017 Aug;99-B(8):1012-1019. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B8.BJJ-2017-0019.R1.
2
Mid-term results of the BIOLOX delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty.BIOLOX delta 陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术的中期结果。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jun;99-B(6):741-748. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-0486.R3.
3
What every surgeon should know about Ceramic-on-Ceramic bearings in young patients.每位外科医生都应了解的关于年轻患者陶瓷对陶瓷关节轴承的知识。
EFORT Open Rev. 2017 Mar 13;1(4):107-111. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000027. eCollection 2016 Apr.
4
Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings total hip arthroplasty in young patients.年轻患者的陶瓷对陶瓷轴承全髋关节置换术
Arthroplast Today. 2016 Aug 25;2(4):205-209. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2016.04.004. eCollection 2016 Dec.
5
Incidence of Ceramic Liner Malseating After Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty Associated With Osteolysis: A 5- to 15-Year Follow-Up Study.陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术后陶瓷内衬安装不良与骨溶解相关的发生率:一项5至15年的随访研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 May;32(5):1641-1646. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.044. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
6
Incidence of Modern Alumina Ceramic and Alumina Matrix Composite Femoral Head Failures in Nearly 6 Million Hip Implants.近600万例髋关节植入物中现代氧化铝陶瓷和氧化铝基复合材料股骨头失效的发生率
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):546-551. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
7
Do the Reasons for Ceramic-on-ceramic Revisions Differ From Other Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty?全髋关节置换术中陶瓷对陶瓷关节翻修的原因与其他假体有差异吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2190-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4917-x.
8
Significantly Lower Wear of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings Than Metal-on-Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Bearings: A 10- to 14-Year Follow-Up Study.陶瓷对陶瓷轴承的磨损显著低于金属对高交联聚乙烯轴承:一项10至14年的随访研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jun;31(6):1246-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.014. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
9
Midterm Results of Delta Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty.德尔塔陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术的中期结果
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep;30(9 Suppl):110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.047. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
10
The Survival Analysis in Third-Generation Ceramic-On-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty.第三代陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术的生存分析
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Nov;30(11):1976-80. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.017. Epub 2015 May 19.

第三代和第四代陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术至少随访十年。

Third and fourth generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years.

作者信息

McCarthy Cathal J, Mahon John, Sheridan Gerard A, Welch-Phillips Adanna, O'Byrne John M, Kenny Paddy J

机构信息

National Orthopaedic Hospital Cappagh, Dublin, Ireland.

Royal College of Surgeon Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Jul 6;31:101942. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101942. eCollection 2022 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101942
PMID:35865324
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9293759/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ceramic on Ceramic bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) afford a low friction coefficient, low wear rates and extreme hardness. Significant complications include hip squeak, ceramic fracture and poor polyethylene performance in revision procedures due to imbedding of abrasive microscopic ceramic fragments. We report on the results of this bearing at a minimum of 10 years.

METHODS

A single-centre retrospective review of 449 THAs was performed. Primary outcome measures included aseptic revision and all-cause revision rates at a minimum of 10 years post operatively. Evaluation of functionality was performed with WOMAC and SF-36 scores which were performed pre-operatively and at intervals of 6 months, one year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years post operatively.

RESULTS

There was a 6.2% (n = 28) all-cause and 5.3% (n = 24) aseptic revision rate for ceramic on ceramic total hip arthroplasty at minimum of 10 years with a mean time to revision 4.8 years (range 2 months-11.6 years). Notably, there were 2 revisions for ceramic head fracture, one for ceramic liner fracture, 3 for aseptic loosening and 3 revisions for squeaking. Pain of unknown origin was the most common reason for revision. There was an improvement in postoperative WOMAC scores from a mean of 59.8 (range 15-95) pre-operatively to a mean of 15.6 (range 0-78) at 10 years.

CONCLUSION

This study showed good functional outcomes but high revision rates for CoC THA at a minimum of 10 years. Our rates of ceramic fracture were consistent with other studies.

摘要

背景

全髋关节置换术(THA)中使用的陶瓷对陶瓷轴承具有低摩擦系数、低磨损率和极高的硬度。其显著并发症包括髋关节摩擦音、陶瓷骨折以及在翻修手术中因微小陶瓷磨粒嵌入导致的聚乙烯性能不佳。我们报告了该轴承至少10年的使用结果。

方法

对449例全髋关节置换术进行了单中心回顾性研究。主要观察指标包括术后至少10年的无菌性翻修率和全因翻修率。通过WOMAC和SF - 36评分对功能进行评估,术前以及术后6个月、1年、2年、5年和10年进行评分。

结果

陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术至少10年时的全因翻修率为6.2%(n = 28),无菌性翻修率为5.3%(n = 24),平均翻修时间为4.8年(范围2个月 - 11.6年)。值得注意的是,有2例因陶瓷股骨头骨折翻修,1例因陶瓷内衬骨折翻修,3例因无菌性松动翻修,3例因摩擦音翻修。不明原因疼痛是最常见的翻修原因。术后WOMAC评分从术前平均59.8(范围15 - 95)改善至10年时的平均15.6(范围0 - 78)。

结论

本研究表明,陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术至少10年时功能结果良好,但翻修率较高。我们的陶瓷骨折发生率与其他研究一致。