Ahmad Farah, Hogg-Johnson Sheilah, Stewart Donna E, Skinner Harvey A, Glazier Richard H, Levinson Wendy
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jul 21;151(2):93-102. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-2-200907210-00124. Epub 2009 Jun 1.
Intimate partner violence and control (IPVC) is prevalent and can be a serious health risk to women.
To assess whether computer-assisted screening can improve detection of women at risk for IPVC in a family practice setting.
Randomized trial. Randomization was computer-generated. Allocation was concealed by using opaque envelopes that recruiters opened after patient consent. Patients and providers, but not outcome assessors, were blinded to the study intervention.
An urban, academic, hospital-affiliated family practice clinic in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Adult women in a current or recent relationship.
Computer-based multirisk assessment report attached to the medical chart. The report was generated from information provided by participants before the physician visit (n = 144). Control participants received standard medical care (n = 149).
Initiation of discussion about risk for IPVC (discussion opportunity) and detection of women at risk based on review of audiotaped medical visits.
The overall prevalence of any type of violence or control was 22% (95% CI, 17% to 27%). In adjusted analyses based on complete cases (n = 282), the intervention increased opportunities to discuss IPVC (adjusted relative risk, 1.4 [CI, 1.1 to 1.9]) and increased detection of IPVC (adjusted relative risk, 2.0 [CI, 0.9 to 4.1]). Participants recognized the benefits of computer screening but had some concerns about privacy and interference with physician interactions.
The study was done at 1 clinic, and no measures of women's use of services or health outcomes were used.
Computer screening effectively detected IPVC in a busy family medicine practice, and it was acceptable to patients.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Ontario Women's Health Council.
亲密伴侣暴力与控制(IPVC)普遍存在,可能对女性健康构成严重风险。
评估在家庭医疗环境中,计算机辅助筛查能否改善对有IPVC风险女性的检测。
随机试验。随机分组由计算机生成。通过使用不透明信封进行分配隐藏,招募人员在患者同意后打开信封。患者和医疗服务提供者对研究干预不知情,但结果评估者知晓。
加拿大安大略省多伦多市一家城市学术性医院附属的家庭医疗诊所。
处于当前或近期恋爱关系中的成年女性。
病历中附带基于计算机的多风险评估报告。该报告根据参与者在就诊前提供的信息生成(n = 144)。对照组参与者接受标准医疗护理(n = 149)。
开始关于IPVC风险的讨论(讨论机会)以及通过审查录音就诊记录检测有风险的女性。
任何类型暴力或控制行为的总体患病率为22%(95%置信区间,17%至27%)。在基于完整病例(n = 282)的调整分析中,干预增加了讨论IPVC的机会(调整相对风险,1.4 [置信区间,1.1至1.9]),并增加了IPVC的检测率(调整相对风险,2.0 [置信区间,0.9至4.1])。参与者认识到计算机筛查的益处,但对隐私和干扰医患互动存在一些担忧。
该研究在一家诊所进行,未使用女性服务利用情况或健康结果的测量指标。
在繁忙的家庭医学实践中,计算机筛查能有效检测出IPVC,且患者可接受。
加拿大卫生研究院和安大略省妇女健康理事会。