McAlister Finlay A, Wiebe Natasha, Ezekowitz Justin A, Leung Alexander A, Armstrong Paul W
University of Alberta Hospital, 2F1.21 Walter Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, 8440 112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jun 2;150(11):784-94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-11-200906020-00006.
Guidelines recommend that patients with heart failure receive beta-blockers in doses used in the trials that have proven their efficacy. Although the adverse effects of beta-blockade are dose-related, it is unclear whether the benefits are.
To determine whether the survival benefits of beta-blockade in heart failure are associated with the magnitude of heart rate reduction or the beta-blocker dose.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SIGLE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, supplemented by hand-searches of bibliographies.
Randomized, placebo-controlled heart failure trials that reported all-cause mortality.
Two reviewers independently extracted data on study characteristics, beta-blocker dosing and heart rate reduction, and death.
The mean left ventricular ejection fraction in the 23 beta-blocker trials ranged from 0.17 to 0.36, and more than 95% of the 19 209 patients had systolic dysfunction. The overall risk ratio for death was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.84); however, heterogeneity testing revealed moderate heterogeneity among trials (I (2) = 30%), which was associated with the magnitude of heart rate reduction achieved within each trial (P for meta-regression = 0.006). For every heart rate reduction of 5 beats/min with beta-blocker treatment, a commensurate 18% reduction (CI, 6% to 29%) in the risk for death occurred. No significant relationship between all-cause mortality and beta-blocker dosing was observed (risk ratio for death, 0.74 [CI, 0.64 to 0.86]) in high-dose beta-blocker trials vs. 0.78 [CI, 0.63 to 0.96] in low-dose beta-blocker trials; P for meta-regression = 0.69).
The analysis is based on aggregate data and resting heart rates. Few patients in these trials had bradycardia or diastolic dysfunction at baseline.
The magnitude of heart rate reduction is statistically significantly associated with the survival benefit of beta-blockers in heart failure, whereas the dose of beta-blocker is not.
指南推荐心力衰竭患者应接受在已证实其疗效的试验中所使用剂量的β受体阻滞剂治疗。尽管β受体阻滞剂的不良反应与剂量相关,但尚不清楚其益处是否也如此。
确定心力衰竭患者中β受体阻滞剂的生存获益是否与心率降低幅度或β受体阻滞剂剂量相关。
MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、SIGLE、科学引文索引以及Cochrane对照试验中心注册库,并辅以对手稿参考文献的手工检索。
报告全因死亡率的随机、安慰剂对照心力衰竭试验。
两名研究者独立提取有关研究特征、β受体阻滞剂给药剂量、心率降低情况及死亡的数据。
23项β受体阻滞剂试验中的平均左心室射血分数范围为0.17至0.36,19209例患者中超过95%存在收缩功能障碍。死亡的总体风险比为0.76(95%可信区间,0.68至0.84);然而,异质性检验显示试验间存在中度异质性(I² = 30%),这与各试验中达到的心率降低幅度相关(Meta回归P值 = 0.006)。β受体阻滞剂治疗使心率每降低5次/分钟,死亡风险相应降低18%(可信区间,6%至29%)。在高剂量β受体阻滞剂试验与低剂量β受体阻滞剂试验中,未观察到全因死亡率与β受体阻滞剂给药剂量之间存在显著关系(高剂量试验中死亡风险比为0.74 [可信区间,0.64至0.86],低剂量试验中为0.78 [可信区间,0.63至0.96];Meta回归P值 = 0.69)。
分析基于汇总数据和静息心率。这些试验中很少有患者在基线时存在心动过缓或舒张功能障碍。
心率降低幅度在统计学上与心力衰竭患者中β受体阻滞剂的生存获益显著相关,而β受体阻滞剂的剂量则不然。