Division of Internal Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
BMJ. 2013 Jan 16;346:f55. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f55.
To clarify whether any particular β blocker is superior in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction or whether the benefits of these agents are mainly due to a class effect.
Systematic review and network meta-analysis of efficacy of different β blockers in heart failure.
CINAHL(1982-2011), Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Trials (-2011), Embase (1980-2011), Medline/PubMed (1966-2011), and Web of Science (1965-2011).
Randomized trials comparing β blockers with other β blockers or other treatments.
The primary endpoint was all cause death at the longest available follow-up, assessed with odds ratios and Bayesian random effect 95% credible intervals, with independent extraction by observers.
21 trials were included, focusing on atenolol, bisoprolol, bucindolol, carvedilol, metoprolol, and nebivolol. As expected, in the overall analysis, β blockers provided credible mortality benefits in comparison with placebo or standard treatment after a median of 12 months (odds ratio 0.69, 0.56 to 0.80). However, no obvious differences were found when comparing the different β blockers head to head for the risk of death, sudden cardiac death, death due to pump failure, or drug discontinuation. Accordingly, improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction were also similar irrespective of the individual study drug.
The benefits of β blockers in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction seem to be mainly due to a class effect, as no statistical evidence from current trials supports the superiority of any single agent over the others.
阐明在射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者中,是否存在某种特定的β受体阻滞剂优于其他药物,或者这些药物的疗效主要归因于β受体阻滞剂这一类药物的作用。
对不同β受体阻滞剂在心力衰竭中的疗效进行系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
CINAHL(1982 年-2011 年)、Cochrane 协作网对照试验中心注册库(-2011 年)、Embase(1980 年-2011 年)、Medline/PubMed(1966 年-2011 年)和 Web of Science(1965 年-2011 年)。
比较β受体阻滞剂与其他β受体阻滞剂或其他治疗方法的随机试验。
主要终点为最长随访时间内的全因死亡率,采用比值比和贝叶斯随机效应 95%可信区间进行评估,由观察者进行独立提取。
共纳入 21 项试验,主要关注阿替洛尔、比索洛尔、布新洛尔、卡维地洛、美托洛尔和奈必洛尔。正如预期的那样,在总体分析中,与安慰剂或标准治疗相比,β受体阻滞剂在 12 个月的中位随访时间内提供了可信的死亡率获益(比值比 0.69,0.56 至 0.80)。然而,当直接比较不同的β受体阻滞剂时,并没有发现死亡风险、心脏性猝死、泵衰竭导致的死亡或药物停药的风险存在明显差异。相应地,左心室射血分数的改善也与个体研究药物无关。
在射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者中,β受体阻滞剂的疗效似乎主要归因于β受体阻滞剂这一类药物的作用,因为目前的试验没有提供任何统计学证据支持任何单一药物优于其他药物。