Sood Manish M, Rigatto Claudio, Bueti Joe, Lang Cory, Miller Lisa, PonnamPalam Arjuna, Reslerova Martina, Sood Amy, Komenda Paul
Boniface General Hospital, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009 Oct;24(10):3162-7. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp252. Epub 2009 Jun 1.
Medication adherence in haemodialysis patients is often challenging due to a high pill burden, complex and dynamic medication regimens and limited patient self-interest in care. The purpose of this study was to investigate the time within target INR and safety profile of thrice weekly warfarin administration in haemodialysis patients with a clinical indication for anticoagulation and documented nonadherence to medications.
Thirty-seven patients from two haemodialysis units in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, were recruited, and 17 patients were treated with thrice weekly warfarin and compared to 20 patients treated with daily warfarin therapy. The patients were followed for 1 year with weekly international normalized ratio (INR), dosage and adverse events recorded. The primary outcome was percentage of time with INR in target and sub (<1.5)- and supra (>4)-therapeutic INR. Adverse events were recorded in the two groups.
The thrice weekly group had a higher burden of comorbidity (Charlson comorbidity index of 6.35 +/- 1.77 versus 4.55 +/- 1.64, P = 0.003) compared to the daily dosage group. In the thrice weekly dosage group, time within target INR was higher (56.9 versus 49.3%, P = 0.008), and time with supra-therapeutic INR > 4 lower (2.7 versus 4.3%, P = 0.03). Total bleeding events (7 versus 6) and major bleeding events (3 versus 2 events) were similar between the two groups.
In this pilot study, thrice weekly warfarin appears to be a safe and feasible dosing strategy in a select patient population. A randomized controlled trial of thrice weekly warfarin is warranted.
血液透析患者的药物依从性往往具有挑战性,原因包括药片负担重、药物治疗方案复杂且多变,以及患者对治疗的自身关注度有限。本研究的目的是调查在有抗凝临床指征且有记录显示不依从药物治疗的血液透析患者中,每周三次服用华法林时处于目标国际标准化比值(INR)的时间以及安全性。
招募了加拿大曼尼托巴省温尼伯市两个血液透析单元的37名患者,其中17名患者接受每周三次的华法林治疗,并与20名接受每日华法林治疗的患者进行比较。对患者进行了为期1年的随访,记录每周的国际标准化比值(INR)、剂量和不良事件。主要结局是INR处于目标值以及低于(<1.5)和高于(>4)治疗性INR的时间百分比。记录两组的不良事件。
与每日给药组相比,每周三次给药组的合并症负担更高(Charlson合并症指数为6.35±1.77,而每日给药组为4.55±1.64,P = 0.003)。在每周三次给药组中,处于目标INR的时间更高(56.9%对49.3%,P = 0.008),而INR高于4的治疗时间更低(2.7%对4.3%,P = 0.03)。两组的总出血事件(7次对6次)和大出血事件(3次对2次)相似。
在这项初步研究中,对于特定患者群体,每周三次服用华法林似乎是一种安全可行的给药策略。有必要对华法林每周三次给药进行随机对照试验。