Poux Jean-Michel, Dardim Karim, Nguyen Quang Thu, Arnaud Graziella, Rouby Marie-Pierre Nord, Manescu Maria
Unité de dialyse médicalisée Alurad de Brive la Gaillarde, centre hospitalier général de Brive, boulevard du Dr-Verlhac, BP 432, 19312 Brive La Gaillarde, France.
Nephrol Ther. 2013 Nov;9(6):426-32. doi: 10.1016/j.nephro.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
We report our experience of thrice-weekly warfarin administration, at the end of the dialysis session, in 12 patients (average age: 79 ± 5 years). In 10 cases, indication for anticoagulation therapy was atrial fibrillation, in one case a mechanical heart valve, in another case axillo femoral bypass. The International Normalized Ratio (INR) therapeutic goal was between 2 and 3, except for the patient with a mechanical aortic heart valve, whose goal was between 2.5 and 3.5. The INR was determined during the first dialysis session of the week. The thrice-weekly warfarin dose was based on this result. INR stability was assessed for each patient over an uninterrupted period of treatment of at least 6 months. The average duration of warfarin treatment was 20 ± 5 months. One in two patients had hypertensive nephropathy. The average Charlson co-morbidity score was 9 ± 1. Four patients were also taking aspirin or clopidogrel. The 10 patients with atrial fibrillation had an average CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score of 4.4 ± 0.8. The average haemorrage risk HAS-BLED score was 3.3 ± 0.6. The average weekly warfarin dose was 23 ± 5 mg. No thrombotic events were observed. The side effects of warfarin were minor in most cases: (1) INR more than 6 in two cases without associated bleeding; (2) minor bleeding (nose, bladder) in three cases. One case of skin necrosis was observed. No cases of major bleeding (requiring blood transfusion) were observed. Only one patient was admitted into hospital as a result of warfarin treatment (the case of skin necrosis). Five hundred and forty-seven INR results were analyzed: 65% of these results were within the therapeutic goal, only 3% were either beneath 1.5 or over 4. To conclude, warfarin administration at the end of the dialysis session is efficient and associated with remarkable INR stability in the goal. It enables precise dose adaptation and optimum therapeutic observance, which in turn reduces the risk of bleeding.
我们报告了12例患者(平均年龄:79±5岁)在透析结束时每周三次服用华法林的经验。其中10例患者抗凝治疗的指征为房颤,1例为机械心脏瓣膜,另1例为腋股旁路移植术。国际标准化比值(INR)的治疗目标为2至3,但植入机械主动脉心脏瓣膜的患者目标为2.5至3.5。在每周的第一次透析 session 期间测定INR。每周三次的华法林剂量基于该结果。在至少6个月的不间断治疗期间评估每位患者的INR稳定性。华法林治疗的平均持续时间为20±5个月。每两名患者中有一名患有高血压肾病。Charlson合并症平均评分为9±1。4名患者还服用阿司匹林或氯吡格雷。10例房颤患者的平均CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc评分为4.4±0.8。出血风险平均HAS-BLED评分为3.3±0.6。每周华法林平均剂量为23±5mg。未观察到血栓事件。在大多数情况下,华法林的副作用较小:(1)2例INR超过6但无相关出血;(2)3例轻微出血(鼻出血、膀胱出血)。观察到1例皮肤坏死。未观察到严重出血(需要输血)的病例。仅1例患者因华法林治疗入院(皮肤坏死病例)。分析了547个INR结果:其中65%的结果在治疗目标范围内,只有3%低于1.5或高于4。总之,在透析结束时服用华法林是有效的,并且在目标范围内具有显著的INR稳定性。它能够实现精确的剂量调整和最佳的治疗依从性,从而降低出血风险。