Auffarth B, de Monchy J G, van der Mark T W, Postma D S, Koëter G H
Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Thorax. 1991 Sep;46(9):638-42. doi: 10.1136/thx.46.9.638.
The relation between citric acid cough threshold and airway hyperresponsiveness was investigated in 11 non-smoking patients with allergic asthma (mean FEV1 94% predicted) and 25 non-atopic smokers with chronic airflow obstruction (mean FEV1 65% predicted). Cough threshold was determined on two occasions by administering doubling concentrations of citric acid. Seven of the 11 asthmatic subjects and 14 of 25 smokers with chronic airflow obstruction had a positive cough threshold on both test days. Cough threshold measurements were reproducible in both groups (standard deviation of duplicate measurements 1.2 doubling concentrations in asthma, 1.1 doubling concentrations in chronic airflow obstruction). Citric acid provocation did not cause bronchial obstruction in most patients, though four patients had a fall in FEV1 of more than 20% for a short time on one occasion only. No significant difference in cough threshold was found between the two patient groups despite differences in baseline FEV1 values. There was no significant correlation between cough threshold and the provocative concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) histamine in either group. Thus sensory nerves can be activated with a tussive agent in patients with asthma and chronic airflow obstruction without causing bronchial smooth muscle contraction.
在11名非吸烟的过敏性哮喘患者(预计FEV1平均为94%)和25名患有慢性气流阻塞的非特应性吸烟者(预计FEV1平均为65%)中,研究了柠檬酸咳嗽阈值与气道高反应性之间的关系。通过给予成倍浓度的柠檬酸,分两次测定咳嗽阈值。11名哮喘患者中的7名以及25名患有慢性气流阻塞的吸烟者中的14名在两个测试日的咳嗽阈值均为阳性。两组的咳嗽阈值测量结果均具有可重复性(哮喘组重复测量的标准差为1.2个成倍浓度,慢性气流阻塞组为1.1个成倍浓度)。柠檬酸激发试验在大多数患者中未引起支气管阻塞,尽管有4名患者仅在某一时刻短时间内FEV1下降超过20%。尽管两组患者的基线FEV1值存在差异,但两组患者的咳嗽阈值未发现显著差异。两组中,咳嗽阈值与导致FEV1下降20%的组胺激发浓度(PC20组胺)之间均无显著相关性。因此,在哮喘和慢性气流阻塞患者中,咳嗽诱发剂可激活感觉神经,而不引起支气管平滑肌收缩。