Suppr超能文献

纤维支气管镜检查中一次性与可重复使用细胞学刷检诊断率的比较。

Comparison of the diagnostic yields of disposable and reusable cytology brushes in fibreoptic bronchoscopy.

作者信息

Kinnear W J, Wilkinson M J, James P D, Johnston I D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University Hospital, Nottingham.

出版信息

Thorax. 1991 Sep;46(9):667-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.46.9.667.

Abstract

Disposable rake and reusable bristle type cytology brushes have been compared in 50 patients undergoing fibreoptic bronchoscopy for suspected malignancy. Forty seven patients were eventually found to have carcinoma of the bronchus. A diagnosis of malignancy was made from the specimens taken with one or other brush in 34 patients, from the reusable brush in 28, and from the disposable brush in 31. The specimens taken with the two types of brush were of similar quality. The reusable brush is about five times less expensive per procedure but carries a risk of cross contamination and cross infection, and time is needed to clean the brush after each bronchoscopy. The diagnostic yield appears to be at least as good with the disposable brush.

摘要

在50例因疑似恶性肿瘤而接受纤维支气管镜检查的患者中,对一次性耙式和可重复使用的刷毛型细胞学刷进行了比较。最终发现47例患者患有支气管癌。34例患者通过使用其中一种刷子采集的标本确诊为恶性肿瘤,28例通过可重复使用的刷子确诊,31例通过一次性刷子确诊。两种刷子采集的标本质量相似。可重复使用的刷子每次检查的成本大约低五倍,但存在交叉污染和交叉感染的风险,并且每次支气管镜检查后都需要时间清洁刷子。一次性刷子的诊断率似乎至少与之相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22de/463367/7d396ed47ec9/thorax00357-0056-a.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验