Zuvekas Samuel H, Olin Gary L
Center for Financing, Access and Cost Trends, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
Inquiry. 2009 Spring;46(1):92-108. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_46.01.92.
This paper examines underreporting and underrepresentation of high expenditure cases in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and their implications for analyses. Our data come from a sample of Medicare beneficiaries in the MEPS who were matched to their Medicare claims and enrollment files, with supplemental data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS). Underreporting of expenditures affected all groups of Medicare beneficiaries in the matched sample, but uniformly so that behavioral analyses were largely unaffected. Straightforward adjustments to the MEPS expenditure estimates could align them with aggregate sources, such as the National Health Expenditure Accounts, while preserving underlying relationships between expenditures and key correlates.
本文研究了医疗支出面板调查(MEPS)中高支出病例的报告不足和代表性不足问题及其对分析的影响。我们的数据来自MEPS中与医疗保险理赔和参保档案匹配的医疗保险受益人的样本,并辅以医疗保险当前受益人调查(MCBS)的数据。支出报告不足影响了匹配样本中所有医疗保险受益人群体,但影响是一致的,因此行为分析在很大程度上未受影响。对MEPS支出估计值进行直接调整,可以使其与诸如国家卫生支出账户等汇总来源保持一致,同时保留支出与关键相关因素之间的潜在关系。