Reddy Kriyana P, Mehta Shreya, Eberly Lauren A, Khatana Sameed Ahmed M, Wang Grace J, Damrauer Scott M, Fanaroff Alexander C, Groeneveld Peter W, Giri Jay, Nathan Ashwin S
Penn Cardiovascular Outcomes, Quality, and Evaluative Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Penn Cardiovascular Outcomes, Quality, and Evaluative Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
J Vasc Surg. 2025 May;81(5):1172-1182.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.132. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
Peripheral artery disease (PAD) affects >12 million Americans and poses significant financial burdens on patients, but the relationship between delayed/forgone (D/F) care and resource use in this population is unknown. We sought to assess the relationship between D/F care, resource use, and health care expenditures among patients with PAD.
Adults with PAD in the United States were identified in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey for years 2007 to 2017. Unweighted counts of reasons for D/F care were tabulated. Proportions of patients with ≥1 emergency department (ED), ≥1 inpatient, ≥1 outpatient, and >5 office-based encounters were compared using Rao-Scott adjusted χ tests. Annual per capita total, out-of-pocket, ED, inpatient, outpatient, office-based visits, and prescription medication expenditures were compared using two-part econometric models.
The study cohort included 2,926,654 patients with PAD. Among the 264,172 patients with PAD (9%) reporting D/F care, 41.2% of patients cited financial barriers as the primary reason for D/F care. There were greater proportions of patients with ≥1 ED visits (52% vs 31%; P < .001), ≥1 outpatient hospital visits (56% vs 43%; P = .004), and >5 office-based visits (81% vs 71%; P = .04) among those reporting D/F care vs those who did not. Patients with D/F care had $7742 (95% confidence interval, $3170-$12,314; P = .001) greater per capita total and $5156 (95% confidence interval, $692-$9,619; P = .02) greater per capita inpatient expenditures per year than patients without D/F care.
D/F care is associated with increased resource use and health care expenditures among patients with PAD. Further work is needed to elucidate the underlying causes of D/F care and mitigate financial burdens on patients with PAD.
外周动脉疾病(PAD)影响着超过1200万美国人,并给患者带来了巨大的经济负担,但在这一人群中,延迟/放弃(D/F)治疗与资源利用之间的关系尚不清楚。我们试图评估PAD患者中D/F治疗、资源利用和医疗保健支出之间的关系。
在2007年至2017年的医疗支出面板调查中识别出美国患有PAD的成年人。将D/F治疗原因的未加权计数制成表格。使用Rao-Scott校正χ检验比较有≥1次急诊科(ED)就诊、≥1次住院、≥1次门诊以及>5次门诊就诊的患者比例。使用两部分计量经济学模型比较人均年度总支出、自付费用、ED、住院、门诊、门诊就诊和处方药支出。
研究队列包括了2926654名PAD患者。在264172名报告有D/F治疗的PAD患者(9%)中,41.2%的患者将经济障碍作为D/F治疗的主要原因。报告有D/F治疗的患者中,有≥1次ED就诊(52%对31%;P <.001)、≥1次门诊就诊(56%对43%;P =.004)以及>5次门诊就诊(81%对71%;P =.04)的患者比例高于未报告有D/F治疗的患者。与没有D/F治疗的患者相比,有D/F治疗的患者每年人均总支出多7742美元(95%置信区间,3170美元至12314美元;P =.001),人均住院支出多5156美元(95%置信区间,692美元至9619美元;P =.02)。
D/F治疗与PAD患者资源利用增加和医疗保健支出增加有关。需要进一步开展工作以阐明D/F治疗的潜在原因并减轻PAD患者的经济负担。