华佗夹脊穴及肌肉刺激仪治疗周围性面瘫的疗效观察
[Observation on therapeutic effect of Hwato never and muscle stimulator on peripheral facial paralysis].
作者信息
Cui Cheng-bin, Yang Jin-sheng, Rong Pei-jing, Zhu Bing, Liu Jia-ying, Han Ying, Liu Wei-zhe, Zhou Yu
机构信息
Hospital of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
出版信息
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2009 May;29(5):421-3.
OBJECTIVE
To observe the therapeutic effect of Hwato never and muscle stimulator on peripheral facial paralysis.
METHODS
Eighty-seven cases of peripheral facial paralysis were randomly divided into a Hwato never and muscle stimulator observation group (n=44) and a G 6805 electronic stimulator control group (n=43). The same acupoints, Hegu (LI 4), Sanyinjiao (SP 6), Taichong (LR 3) and local acupoints on the affected side were selected in the two groups. The therapeutic effects were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS
Although the total effective rates were both 100.0% in the two groups, the cured rate was 90.9% in the observation group and 62.8% in the control group with a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). There were no adverse effects in the two groups.
CONCLUSION
The cured rate of Hwato never and muscle stimulator on peripheral facial paralysis is superior to that of G 6805 electronic stimulator.
目的
观察华佗牌神经肌肉刺激仪治疗周围性面瘫的疗效。
方法
将87例周围性面瘫患者随机分为华佗牌神经肌肉刺激仪观察组（n = 44）和G 6805型电子刺激仪对照组（n = 43）。两组均选取相同穴位，即合谷（LI 4）、三阴交（SP 6）、太冲（LR 3）及患侧局部穴位。比较两组的治疗效果。
结果
两组总有效率均为100.0%，但观察组治愈率为90.9%，对照组治愈率为62.8%，两组差异有统计学意义（P < 0.05）。两组均未出现不良反应。
结论
华佗牌神经肌肉刺激仪治疗周围性面瘫的治愈率优于G 6805型电子刺激仪。
Zotero 插件