• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“安全期”过后早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术是否安全?

Is early laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe after the "safe period"?

作者信息

Farooq Tahir, Buchanan Gordon, Manda Vijay, Kennedy Robin, Ockrim Jonathan

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Yeovil, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Aug;19(4):471-4. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0363.

DOI:10.1089/lap.2008.0363
PMID:19489677
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) in acute cholecystitis improves hospital stay and outcome. Operative difficulty is said to increase with delay, and surgery is usually advised within 3 days of presentation. It can be difficult to accommodate all these patients within 3 days; this study evaluates results within and after this "safe period."

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 137 patients (male:female 45:92) presenting as an emergency due to acute cholecystitis over 45 months from August 1, 2003, who then underwent ELC with an on-table cholangiogram (OTC) or laparoscopic ultrasound were prospectively studied. Outcome was compared between those who underwent surgery within 72 hours (group 1) or after 72 hours (group 2).

RESULTS

There were 87 patients in group 1 versus 50 in group 2. There was no significant difference with reference to ASA grading, length of operation (median 90 vs. 90 minutes; P = 1.000), conversion rates (7 vs. 10%; P = 0.523), median postoperative stay (2 vs. 3 days; P = 0.203), or 30-day readmission rates [5/87 [6%] vs. 3/50 [6%]; P = 1.000] between groups, respectively. There was no mortality. One patient had a biliary leak from a duct of Lushka in group 2, which settled after endoscopic stenting.

CONCLUSION

In experienced hands, ELC is safe even after 72 hours.

摘要

背景

急性胆囊炎早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术(ELC)可改善住院时间和治疗效果。据说手术难度会随着时间延迟而增加,通常建议在发病后3天内进行手术。在3天内收治所有这些患者可能会有困难;本研究评估了在这个“安全期”内及之后的治疗结果。

材料与方法

对2003年8月1日起45个月内因急性胆囊炎作为急诊就诊的137例患者(男:女为45:92)进行前瞻性研究,这些患者随后接受了术中胆管造影(OTC)或腹腔镜超声检查的ELC。比较了在72小时内接受手术的患者(第1组)和72小时后接受手术的患者(第2组)的治疗结果。

结果

第1组有87例患者,第2组有50例患者。两组在ASA分级、手术时长(中位数90分钟对90分钟;P = 1.000)、中转率(7%对10%;P = 0.523)、术后中位住院时间(2天对3天;P = 0.203)或30天再入院率[5/87(6%)对3/50(6%);P = 1.000]方面均无显著差异。无死亡病例。第2组有1例患者来自卢氏管的胆漏,在内镜下置入支架后得到解决。

结论

在经验丰富的医生手中,即使在72小时后进行ELC也是安全的。

相似文献

1
Is early laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe after the "safe period"?“安全期”过后早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术是否安全?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Aug;19(4):471-4. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0363.
2
Outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis performed at a single institution.在单一机构进行的早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的疗效
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2019 Jan;12(1):74-80. doi: 10.1111/ases.12487. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
3
Evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的疗效评估。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 Jan-Feb;56(89):26-8.
4
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎]
G Chir. 2008 Jun-Jul;29(6-7):305-11.
5
Emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an unselected cohort: a safe and viable option in a specialist centre.在一个专科中心,对未经选择的患者队列实施紧急腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一种安全可行的选择。
Int J Surg. 2010;8(6):489-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.06.015. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
6
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: support for an early interval surgery.急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜胆囊切除术:支持早期间隔手术
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2014 Sep;77(3):306-11.
7
Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis, Are the 72 hours Still the Rule?: A Randomized Trial.早期与延迟胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎:72 小时仍然是金标准吗?:一项随机试验。
Ann Surg. 2016 Nov;264(5):717-722. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001886.
8
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: an analysis of early versus delayed cholecystectomy and predictive factors for conversion.急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜胆囊切除术:早期与延迟胆囊切除术分析及中转手术的预测因素
Minerva Chir. 2017 Dec;72(6):455-463. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.17.07412-0. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
9
Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis within and beyond 72 h of symptom onset during emergency admissions.比较发病 72 小时内和 72 小时后行急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的效果。
World J Surg. 2012 Nov;36(11):2654-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1709-7.
10
Feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis beyond 72 h of symptom onset.症状出现超过72小时的急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性。
Updates Surg. 2016 Dec;68(4):377-383. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0409-5. Epub 2016 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of emergency cholecystectomy and delayed cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较经皮经肝胆囊引流术后行急诊胆囊切除术与延期胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2021 Apr;73(2):481-494. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00894-4. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
2
Readmissions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a UK District General Hospital.英国地区综合医院行腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的再入院情况。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3534-3538. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5380-1. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
3
Comparison of clinical result between early laparoscopic cholecystectomy and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for patients with complicated acute cholecystitis.
经皮经肝胆道胆囊引流术后早期与延期腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗复杂性急性胆囊炎患者的临床结果比较
Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2012 Nov;16(4):147-53. doi: 10.14701/kjhbps.2012.16.4.147. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
4
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to delayed acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of case-control studies.早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术优于延迟性急性胆囊炎:病例对照研究的荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):1172-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4325-4. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
5
Surgical management of acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎的外科治疗
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 May;400(4):403-19. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1306-y. Epub 2015 May 14.
6
Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis within and beyond 72 h of symptom onset during emergency admissions.比较发病 72 小时内和 72 小时后行急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的效果。
World J Surg. 2012 Nov;36(11):2654-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1709-7.
7
Low ninety-day re-admission rates after emergency and elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a district general hospital.一家地区综合医院急诊和择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术后90天再入院率较低。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 May;92(4):307-10. doi: 10.1308/003588410X12664192075053.