Tubercle. 1991 Jun;72(2):88-100. doi: 10.1016/0041-3879(91)90034-p.
Two chemotherapy regimens of 28 weeks (6M) and 36 weeks (8M) duration were compared in patients with previously untreated pulmonary tuberculosis in 30 health districts of Algeria. In the 6M regimen, patients received isoniazid plus rifampicin daily throughout with streptomycin and pyrazinamide in addition for the first 8 weeks. In the 8M regimen patients received isoniazid daily throughout plus rifampicin for the first 16 weeks and streptomycin and pyrazinamide as well for the first 8 weeks. The districts were allocated to apply either the 6M or the 8M regimen to all eligible patients. However, 22% of eligible patients were not admitted, the most common reason being oversight on the part of the personnel in the local health centres. A total of 2218 (977 6M, 1241 8M) patients was admitted and the results were assessed 2 years after the due date of completion of chemotherapy, irrespective of whether or not management had deviated from the study protocol. An appreciable proportion of patients (25% of 6M, 29% of 8M) could not be assessed because they failed to attend for follow-up or the collection of specimens was overlooked or because of difficulties in the transport of specimens to the reference laboratory in Algiers, and a further 5% and 4% of patients died. Of those who were assessable 7 (1%) of 731 6M and 15 (2%) of 875 8M were classified as having an unfavourable response during or after chemotherapy because they had one or more positive cultures. In addition 16 (2%) 6M and 18 (2%) 8M patients had received additional chemotherapy for failure, relapse or the development of non-pulmonary lesions but had achieved a favourable status. Of 1018 (488 6M, 530 8M) patients assessed who had fully sensitive strains pretreatment and completed treatment as planned, 97% in both series had a favourable status 2 years after their chemotherapy was due to be completed. In patients with initial strains resistant to isoniazid the results were less good in the 8M than the 6M series: none of the 19 6M compared with 5 of 26 in the 8M series having an unfavourable outcome suggesting that the duration of rifampicin may have been important in patients with initial isoniazid resistance. A slightly higher proportion of patients on the 8M regimen defaulted during chemotherapy (9.3% compared with 6.7% in the 6M regimen) but there was no difference between the regimens in other measures of compliance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在阿尔及利亚的30个卫生区,对28周(6个月)和36周(8个月)疗程的两种化疗方案进行了比较,研究对象为先前未经治疗的肺结核患者。在6个月疗程方案中,患者在整个疗程中每日服用异烟肼加利福平,在前8周还加用链霉素和吡嗪酰胺。在8个月疗程方案中,患者在整个疗程中每日服用异烟肼,在前16周加用利福平,前8周也加用链霉素和吡嗪酰胺。这些卫生区分组对所有符合条件的患者采用6个月或8个月疗程方案。然而,22%符合条件的患者未被纳入,最常见的原因是当地卫生中心工作人员的疏忽。共有2218名患者(977名接受6个月疗程方案,1241名接受8个月疗程方案)被纳入研究,并在化疗应完成日期2年后评估结果,无论治疗管理是否偏离研究方案。相当一部分患者(6个月疗程方案组的25%,8个月疗程方案组的29%)无法进行评估,原因是他们未前来接受随访、标本采集被忽视,或因标本运输至阿尔及尔参考实验室存在困难,另有5%和4%的患者死亡。在可评估的患者中,73样方案组有7例(1%)、8个月疗程方案组有15例(2%)在化疗期间或化疗后被归类为反应不佳,因为他们有一次或多次培养结果呈阳性。此外,16例(2%)6个月疗程方案组和18例(2%)8个月疗程方案组患者因治疗失败、复发或出现肺外病变而接受了额外化疗,但病情已好转。在1018例(488例6个月疗程方案组,530例8个月疗程方案组)接受评估且治疗前菌株完全敏感并按计划完成治疗的患者中,两个疗程方案组在化疗应完成2年后,97%的患者病情好转。对于初始菌株对异烟肼耐药的患者,8个月疗程方案组的结果不如6个月疗程方案组:6个月疗程方案组的19例患者中无一例结果不佳,而8个月疗程方案组的26例中有5例出现不良结果,这表明利福平的疗程对初始异烟肼耐药的患者可能很重要。8个月疗程方案组在化疗期间的违约率略高(9.%,而6个月疗程方案组为6.%),但在其他依从性指标方面,两个疗程方案组之间没有差异。(摘要截选至400字)